this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
582 points (96.9% liked)

Canada

7130 readers
384 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The landlord had told them he wanted to raise the rent to $3,500 and when they complained he decided to raise it to $9,500.

“We know that our building is not rent controlled and this was something we were always worried about happening and there is no way we can afford $9,500 per month," Yumna Farooq said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 218 points 1 year ago (33 children)

It shows that "no rent control" basically means "your landlord can throw you out at any time without notice" by raising rent to a ludicrous amount. It completely undermines all other tenant protections. Even conservatives should be supporting at least modest rent controls to prevent cases like this.

[–] extant@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Most conservatives are middle class small business owners and landlords, this is why they are always supportive of "small government" it's just a dog whistle for unregulated market.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 year ago

I saw a documentary that spoke to some Twump (sic) supporters who lived in a shithole building that they didn't realize was owned by the Kushners. I can't recall anything else about it that might help identify it.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Modest is what we had before. Never vote Conservative.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world 185 points 1 year ago (99 children)

Landlords are parasites on society.

load more comments (99 replies)
[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 143 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Same thing is happening to me right now (UK). LL inherited a portfolio of mortgage-free properties a few years back, immediately jacked the rent up on them all. I tried to haggle what imo was an egregious rent increase (notified middle of the year after asking for a minor repair), we agreed on a price then he served me notice to quit; via the letting agent, not a peep or thanks from the LL after I've put ~£90000 into his familys' accounts over 13 yrs.

Of course, I can pay someone elses mortgage, but when I apply to a bank for one myself, I can't afford it.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I can pay someone elses mortgage, but when I apply to a bank for one myself, I can’t afford it.

But when you can't afford it any longer, the landlord is free to replace you with someone who temporarily can. That's the difference!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] virku@lemmy.world 106 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Here in Norway ut is illegal to raise rent more than once a year and maximum by the current consumer price index. If the rent isn't raised a year you don't get to raise for that years CPI.

[–] nikt@lemmy.ca 55 points 1 year ago (5 children)

There is a similar rule in Ontario, but it doesn’t apply to buildings built after 2018.

This exemption was put in place as an incentive for more rental units to be put on the market (or to enrich developers and landholders, depending on your political stance).

[–] cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s frustrating that that’s a fixed date, instead it should be a floating date of 5 or so years.

The fixed date creates a weird scenario where the controlled supply is limited but the uncontrolled supply isn’t, which allows gross pricing disparities to arise and allows old-building owners and new to abuse their tenants (for old: you can’t afford to leave, for new: good luck getting a cheaper place, they’re all full).

A floating rent-control date balances things: developers only get to be greedy for so long, the supply of controlled housing is increases so pricing is more even, and landlords will want good relationships with tenants when they know they’re going to get “stuck” with them in a rent-controlled scenario.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

A floating rent-control date

... is still a bad idea. Let's not focus on what kind of bat we're beaten with; let's just get Ontario back on track.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

This used to exist in Ontario but the Conservatives removed it for anything built or renovated after 2018. Canadians need to learn to never vote Conservative.

[–] anguo@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago (9 children)

It's similar in Quebec. Unfortunately this is only enforced by informed renters, so landlords often raise it much more than the allowed amount when someone moves out.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 90 points 1 year ago (34 children)
load more comments (33 replies)
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago

It doesn't really help the case that they show a picture a sky line dream apartment, but still that price is ridiculous and obviously there to drive them out.

[–] leaf@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 year ago

This absolutely should not be legal

[–] Echo71Niner@lemm.ee 42 points 1 year ago

Fuck Canada, more than half of Canadian politicians are fucking landlords and this is why they allow these abusive and scummy laws to stay, no rent protection, fuck this country.

[–] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 40 points 1 year ago

When escalation of this magnitude is your solution, you shouldn't be surprised when your clients respond with violence.

load more comments
view more: next ›