Am I the only one who doesn't like to use these?
And refuses to use the frame generation?
I'd much prefer real 30fps, over strange fake 120.
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)
PC Gaming
8536 readers
762 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
frame gen? for sure, you are right. upscaling? Upscaling is an amazing way to improve your framerate dlss is often indistinguishable from native except for the framerate. And even fsr 1 which is the worst method for upscaling that doesn't get any help from AI or motion vectors but that's compatible with every single game works often great for me upscaling from 1080p to 1440p
I've found it depends a lot on the game. In CP2077, DLSS+frame gen looks great to me with full raytracing enabled. But in The Witcher 3, I found frame gen to cause a lot of artifacts, and in PvP games I wouldn't use regular DLSS/FSR. In general I've found the quality preset in DLSS to be mostly indistinguishable from native on 3440x1440, and I'm excited to try FSR 3 when I get the chance.