this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
163 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
383 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
163
EU says X’s paid-for blue check deceives users, breaks law • The Register (go.theregister.com)
submitted 4 months ago by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/technology@beehaw.org
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 65 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Musk decided to respond to the EC's findings on Friday by claiming: "The European Commission offered X an illegal secret deal: If we quietly censored speech without telling anyone, they would not fine us.

"The other platforms accepted that deal. X did not."

The same Musk who in March said, "Just to be super clear, I am not donating money to either candidate for US President," and reportedly now has donated to a super PAC working to elect Donald Trump to the White House.

Lmao. What a response. Doesn't respond in any way, instead blames eu for some random "illegal secret deal". Sure bud.

Weird how much that response sounds like Trump. Just say random bs to divert the actual question.

[–] Kissaki@beehaw.org 39 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Putin, Trump, and Musk. They're doing the same thing. Lying without restraint, freely, at every opportunity.

"The European Commission offered X an illegal secret deal: If we quietly censored speech without telling anyone, they would not fine us.

Maybe we can translate that claim to what may have happened?

"The European Commission asked X to conform to regulation protecting its citizens or face fines."

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"You're hosting hate speech. We have laws that say you can't do that and offer your service in our jurisdiction. Remove the hate speech or we'll fine you"

"THIS IS AN ILLEGAL SECRET DEAL"

[–] seSvxR3ull7LHaEZFIjM@feddit.de 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I support any and all EU laws against Xitter out of spite, they could be making Elon Musk square dance for every piece of misinformation for all I care.

[–] Kissaki@beehaw.org 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

dan ce

Hello. This is the EU grammar police. Please fix your typo. Thank you for your cooperation.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 2 points 4 months ago

I am with the Commission and I am here to help

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 23 points 4 months ago (2 children)

A simple fix to make it more transparent : replace the blue check by a 🪙 or 💵. Now, the blue check just represent paid users.

[–] verstra@programming.dev 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If they made that, they could also make it so one can pay 10x more for each additional icon.

So 10e for one, 100e for two, 1000e for three and so on.

This would allow us to recognise all people seeking attention by flashing money very easily. Bonus points if we are able to filter feeds by number of icons.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Reddit would then sue for plagiarism.

[–] Truck_kun@beehaw.org 2 points 4 months ago

pile of pennies < Single Bill < stack/bundle of cash < pile of cash < scrooge mcduck cash dive vault

or

bronze coin < silver coin < gold coin < pile of coins < gold bar < stack of gold bards < fort knox

[–] Kissaki@beehaw.org 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

How about adding a check mark to the money icon? I think that fits better.

Name 💵✅ or Name 💵✔️

As if to say "has money", or "spent money".