this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
25 points (64.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35723 readers
911 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Title

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 82 points 3 months ago (5 children)

No, that's not how it works. It would be the same as not voting at all, since RFK has no chance of winning.

Vote for Biden if you want to stop Trump.

[–] chagall@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It depends on the state. If it’s a purple state or a state where they do ranked-choice voting, then this is right and a vote for Biden is helpful.

If OP is in a solid red state, he can vote for any alternative candidate and it won’t matter which alt candidate he chooses since Trump will already have it locked up.

The only asterisk is if abortion is on the ballot as a statewide measure. That can take a red state (like Kentucky) and turn out enough voters to temporarily make it blue.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Every state is a purple state. If all the voters who usually stay home voted, any state could go for Biden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I was under the impression that the OP wanted to vote tactically, but if that isn't relevant in their particular state, then they should vote their preference.

Since RJK is an unhinged anti-vaxxer and conspiracy theorist, I would suggest voting for Biden, since it may move the needle for future elections.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mecfs@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I guarantee you Biden will outperform RFK in every state, including Wyoming and Missippi.

Voting for RFK helps him pass the threshold for federal party funding and effectively gives money to a nut.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 69 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you want Biden to win vote for Biden. Jesus fucking Christ.

Gaming primaries is a ~potentially valid~ idea but in what world do you think voting for the ~other~ candidate in a winner-takes-all election would help your desired candidate win?

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I mean statistically in a state THAT red your there will never be enough blue votes to overcome the stupidity of the rural class, so it may not matter. Still voting for the off brand inside a 2 party system is a very bad habit to encourage. Just vote for Biden.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Georgia proved that wrong last election. Imagine if out of nowhere Texas voted blue due to all the abortion bans, Republicans would shit themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 55 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (34 children)

No. Vote Biden.

UPDATE: Vote Harris!*

If you can spare the time or money, volunteer and donate to the campaign in places they can actually win.

EDIT: Also, vote Democrat if there are any other elections going on at the same time. If Trump does win, the only chance of holding him to any kind of account is to have as many Democrats in positions of power as possible.

Sincerely, someone who can't vote in your elections but still lives with the knock-on effects!

*EDIT 2: Absolute necro-editing to change this to say Vote Harris.

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 3 months ago

No. What? No! In what world does this make any sense? The only way your vote for RFK could possibly "take away" a vote from Trump, is if you were going to vote for Trump but changed your mind.

Your vote doesn't affect the vote count of the other candidates...

[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 37 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, it's better for you to vote for Biden and convince Trumpers to vote for RFK. You want those who vote for Trump to vote for RFK for a spoiler effect

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No because RFK is a fucking joke - When states are called solid "red" or "blue" they're usually 60+% in favor of a party. More people in your state are voting for Biden than RFK so if you're hoping to flip your state vote for the democrat.

[–] Starbuck@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I feel like in most states, non-voters overwhelm the difference between the two candidates. Vote s d find a friend to vote with.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

No. Vote Biden.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Because of our garbage voting system, any vote not going to the top two candidates is the same as scribbling over that section of the ballot. If your goal is to not have Donald win, you want to add as many votes as you can for the other of the top two candidates.

The only way a vote for RFK would help prevent Donald is if it were coming from someone who otherwise certainly would have voted for Donald. Even then the ideal is that they vote for an opponent who has a chance of winning.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ingalls@lemmy.today 25 points 3 months ago

If you live in a red state and want Trump to not get your EC votes, your most likely path to success is voting for Biden and trying as hard as you can to convince people who don’t usually vote to also do so. Voting for RFK won’t change the tally enough.

[–] memfree@lemmy.ml 23 points 3 months ago

Why not vote (D)? The Rs plan on contesting the voting everywhere all the time, and if the last round was any indicator, they will even contest in places the win, so.... IF the goal is to take votes from Trump, it would probably be better to show that even in fire red areas, there are still some cool blues.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 23 points 3 months ago

No. Vote for Biden.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

When people say that, they mean a person who would have voted for trump. Instead voting rfk.

If you were never voting trump, you vote can't be taken away because it was never voting for trump to begin with

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (4 children)

If you are in a deep red state, it will seem that your vote won't matter. Because it mostly won't. However, the way States vote changes over time. The closer the vote totals in a State, the more likely the National Democratic Party is to invest resources into building up and promoting candidates in those States. That sort of thing can shift the needle, if slowly. Keep in mind that California voted Republican from '68 to '88 (source) but shifted over time.

It sucks to vote and feel like you're just pissing in the wind. But, each vote moves the needle just a bit more and maybe, eventually, things will swing.

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

"Pissing in the wind" is such a great phrase

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

A vote for RFK is one less vote for Trump. A vote for Biden is twice that

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Kennedy is only on the ballot in 14 states, so first, it's unlikely he'll be on your ballot.

Alaska, California, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee and Utah.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Where can you add names to the ballot?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Each state has their own process, generally you have to submit enough signatures.

They also have their own deadlines... beyond which signatures are not accepted.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

You're not going to affect the outcome so cast whatever vote makes sleep the happiest.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 3 months ago

maybe in the primaries but this would be like not voting at all.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

the answer you are looking for the opportunity has already passed this year but is useful in the next election.

What you ate looking for is to vote tactically. Vote republican in the in the primary and choose weak republican candidates then vote democratic in the general.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

This strategy worked well in 2016!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›