this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10051 readers
945 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trans Mountain oil pipeline expansion (TMX) was meant to shrink the discount on Canadian oil versus U.S. crude but three months in the differential is wider than when commercial operations on the project started.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure Albertans and Cons will blame Trudeau!

[–] Nogami@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It’s all they know how to do. Was just reading about UCP in Alberta. What a shit show of conspiracy theories and utter crap. Chemtrails and covid. Does nobody go to school there?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 11 months ago

Trans?! We gotta attack this! /s

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"We increased supply! That makes prices go up, right?"

[–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No see we increased the markets its available to instead of relying on the worlds largest oil producer bying it we can ship it around the world competing with all the other oil producers... (this is the argument they gave not me)

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

And if we had spent the tens of billions on healthcare or housing we would have created as many or more jobs and also had something useful to show for it.

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

What a scam and we didn’t even get an oil fund.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That would be an ecological disaster.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No. Massive crude oil spilled into the watersheds of BC and Alberta would be far worse. The fact that this needs explaining to you is telling of your actual concern for the environment.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 10 months ago

Guess you need to review the IPCC reports

[–] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 1 points 10 months ago

No, it would be an ecological and humanitarian disaster.

While Alberta's ecosystem is barely hanging on thanks to decades of de-facto oil industry government. BCs is struggling from climate change.

Then you have to thank Pierre Pollievre and Harper for the pipeline route that passes through at least one municipal watershed.

But not Nestle's watershed. They changed the route for Nestle.