this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
246 points (98.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54500 readers
711 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The ongoing and often extreme and overreaching battle against piracy within the audiovisual industry continues to escalate, with recent discussions focusing on devices capable of infringing intellectual property (IP) rights. As stated by Sheila Cassells, Executive VP at the Audiovisual Anti-Piracy Alliance (AAPA), companies in the entertainment sector should be wary of “any technological development” that could potentially grant access to pirated content.

From historical technology like the VCR to modern advances like AI, all technology holds inherent potentials for piracy.

At the center of these discussions are specific devices including set-top boxes, Firesticks, and Android apps, often condemned for enabling piracy. The AAPA’s somewhat radical standpoint is a call to outlaw the production, marketing, and distribution of any such device.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mariah@feddit.rocks 139 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What? Are they gonna ban every device ever

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 46 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And replace them with walled-garden devices that don't allow you to do anything besides a restricted set of uses defined by manufactures and right holders.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which just so happen to enforce ultra conservative moral standards and make any discourse about changing the system impossible. Totally coincidentally, of course.

[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As soon as you can write text with it you technically are able to pirat...

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

Which is why every text you write needs to be approved by the review board. But it's totally not censorship.

[–] catsup@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Walled garden? More like golden prission

[–] Aetherion@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

hey stop, I like my mac

[–] panmeek@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure that you had a certain company in mind when you wrote this

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

They are probably so out of touch that they might just ban the sale of DVD burners lol

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 62 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's literally everything. Every. Single. Thing. What an idiot.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is how they do it though. "We're going to ban everything!" Some months later 10 things are banned. Regular people "Whew! Well at least they only banned 10 things and not everything. We're so lucky!".

Yup. And the masses eat it up like the good little herd they are.

[–] PinkPanther@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Sand must also be illegal, since we can technically write in sand, which could be used for copyright infringement. What a fucking idiot.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Damn, well it's been fun using digital electronics everyone

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have no plans to stop, this will be difficult if not impossible to enforce.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

Scofflaw! Scofflaw I say!

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

They're coming for the analog electronics next.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 49 points 1 year ago

You could use a typewriter to copy any book, so they’re about as dangerous a technology as it gets.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ErwinLottemann@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago

maybe even roflmao

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, reactionary extremist endorses radical sweeping policy without considering consequences?

[–] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

I can't see this going wrong at all

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

RIP my prescription glasses.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago

The AAPA’s somewhat radical standpoint is a call to outlaw the production, marketing, and distribution of any such device.

That's not "somewhat radical", it's absolutist insanity. They want full control of everyone, so they can extract maximum profit, individuality and freedom be damned.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oops! Now pens and pencils, and computers and paints and such are outlawed because they can all be used to duplicate copyrighted materials and infringe upon IPs. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also our brains are banned, too, since we use them to plan and take actions to infringe on IP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alpharius@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 year ago

Let's ban computers then. Oh you can share content from these various technologies ? Ban them ! Your CPU is able to process data of any kind ? Banned ! You made a code project that is able to process and share data ? Banned !

This whole trend of banning things that "can" be used to make any illegal activities is ridiculous. VPNs are widely used by pirates and criminals to share illegal content on the web but it is also a very powerful tool to escape censorship and obtain a certain of privacy on the web. Tor also falls into it, while ironically being made by the US army, is also a very good free tool for activists of all kind to express their claims and evade censorship as well. Torrent was made to transfer files of any kind as a peer to peer technology and is still very useful outside of sharing illegal content.

If we start banning every tools used by the common people for normal (and legal) practices because a small group of people use them for illegal purpose, everything will be restricted, banned or heavily regulated.

[–] xtremeownage@lemmyonline.com 28 points 1 year ago

They are going to feel pretty damn stupid when nobody can buy/rent/watch/listen to their content and products...

Because, ya know... any product which can play any form of media, has the potential to infringe on IP....

I say, give them EXACTLY what they want. Give them, a week or two with zero profits, and see how quickly they change their tune.

[–] d1tt0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 year ago

She probably wrote that quote in an email with the signature "From my iPhone".

what a dolt.

[–] kid4today@feddit.uk 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve got a better idea, let’s just ban human beings!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Let's ban writing! Return to monkey!

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

So computers and phones should be banned too then? These people are absolutely clowns lmao

This is the stupidest thing I've read this year LOL.

[–] PlatypusXray@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago

Maybe one day people will wake up and realize that it is somewhat odd to think you could own ideas. Intellectual property is a bullshit concept.

[–] mefinity@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago

So, everything

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

Shut your fucking cake-hole Sheila. It might reproduce copyrighted content.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago

Maybe instead of trying to blame the tools, why don't we blame the system instead?

Copyright shouldn't be a thing in the 21th century.

[–] bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This might be the dumbest shit I've heard in a while.

You'd better ban fingers too.

And all kinds of cameras and recording devices.

Laptops. Computers. Smart TVs. Ban it all. We'll play with a hoop and a stick and be happy.

[–] Iceblade02@lemdit.com 10 points 1 year ago

Oh no but you might use a stick to draw a copyrighted work in the sand!

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

After reading the article this is yet again the same argument that if nothing is done, artists and creators are the one being hurt by the piracy.

Except that it is not.

The claim for banning anything and everything that can be potentially subverted to facilitate access to protected intelectual property is ridiculous. The world would grind to a halt if such request was to be actually enforced, as anyone participating in this thread has already stated.

But what if we were to actually jump on this band wagon?

By definition, any word spoken on a podcast, any video on a video platform, any word or sentence jotted down on any social platform, is intelectual property if by any means can be monetized.

Let's claim our share of the revenue gained from our intelectual property. Let's demand that by definition every individual is protected by copyright law, even if we need to create associations to collectively represent us.

How would that work against this pile of idiocy?

Sounds like she needs to go off grid completely because clearly she doesn't understand that a large percentage of the world is made up of tech. Might as well ban her phone, laptop, television, vehicle, etc. Let her become a tree fairy.

[–] bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

I'm just going to go outside and check the seedbox running on my Tesla roadster before I rip and upload a couple of episodes using the computer on my refrigerator and then post them from my Smart TV.

Checkmate copyright whores.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't we already pay something extra on each device, because it could be used (how democratic) to handle pirated media?

If so, discussion done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ahh 'technological development'. I've been to the museum and learned how paper is made. And how ballpoint pens are made. Would that constitute technology or are we allowed to use pens and paper?

But the linked interview within the linked article mainly talks about IPTV and video streaming. I think this clickbaity title is taking things out of context.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Well that’s stupid. I could infringe IP by carving a gloved mouse on a stone tablet. Are you gonna ban stone tablets? And hands? Jesus, Sheila, get a grip.

[–] MasterBuilder@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Wow. You mean people might gave to read actual books for entertainment?

If by some miracle the legal establishment takes this schmuck seriously, it is the end of the entertainment industry.

[–] Timbo303@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

This would ban your own PC, and capture cards entirely. Theres no way around piracy existing just face it.

load more comments
view more: next ›