this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
828 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
5156 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Enshittification strikes again. 🤬

[–] snailfact@infosec.pub 13 points 3 months ago

someone can just make a cracked version people can sideload

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 12 points 3 months ago

I will never throw a brick through the headquarters of Anova, nor would I advocate for others doing it.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I bet the app requires cloud hosting for it to run, and its starting to eat away at the profits they made.

If it needs nothing but bluetooth, then this a pure money grab.

[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

It use to operate only off of Bluetooth, & then they added single band WiFi. They just added dual band WiFi as a new feature & are now removing Bluetooth functionality completely.

Absolutely a cash grab.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 3 months ago

Usually, if it needs cloud hosting, it's because they're collecting your data. That presumably is a revenue stream for them.

I have one of these, and I haven't touched the app. Works perfectly fine without it.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have two Anova cookers and have never needed the app fwiw

[–] MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

I honestly didn't know there was an app and use mine a few times a month.

[–] Kanzar@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Guess inkbird are going to get recommended a lot more...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

I own one of these, and I honestly forgot there was an app. There's literally no reason for it, outside of the timed-start mode that I never use.

Honestly, the biggest mistake was making this an IoT device to begin with.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

For those of us on Android, can't we download the old APK which still talks Bluetooth and just never interact with the web/wifi for these?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I have one of these. The sous vide cooker itself is very nice and easy to use, I’d highly recommend it. The app is a bit clunky and not necessary to use the device. I certainly wouldn’t pay $2 a month for it.

The app lets you set a temperature and cook time, but you can also do this using the buttons on the cooker. Sometimes the WiFi pairing is finicky, so honestly I skip the app half the time. The app also lets you view and write recipes. I guess the big advantage is you can click “start cooking” and it automatically sets the device temp and time, but doing it manually isn’t much harder. I’m also not wowed by the in-app recipe selection, and generally just get recipes from the internet.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

They do this, because plebs pay...

There is a lesson in there

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RangerJosie@sffa.community 6 points 3 months ago

Lol. Hell no.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Oh good, it's not the joule. That would suck big time. You can only use it via the app.

[–] admin@lemmy.haley.io 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That was my first thought as well. I love that thing but I hate that it requires the app to run

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

Y'all should read Unauthorized Bread from Cory Doctorow. This hits so close to home.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cost or no cost, IoT should not be able to brick devices on the whim - or unexpected dissolution - of a faceless corporation.

Unfortunately too many people are trusting of monolithic entities which promise the moon and then decide what they really meant was "bend over".

I may be channelling a bit of Louis Rossman here.

That said, the other comments here suggest that the device in question still has all features when accessed from the front panel, which is a step up from a lot of other IoT behaviour. Owners who don't want to pay for the app should still disconnect it from any connectivity and keep it that way just in case the manufacturer decides to remove that functionality as well.

And if it stops working altogether without network connectivity, take the L and maybe mail it back to the company's head office with no return address. Let them deal with the e-waste.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 5 points 3 months ago

I was given one of those. I tried the app once and immediately uninstalled it. It's worthless. The "let's put AI in your computer mouse, toothbrush, and toilet scrubber!" of ten years ago.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›