this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31052 readers
2095 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me, it may be that the toilet paper roll needs to have the open end away from the wall. I don't want to reach under the roll to take a piece! That's ludicrous!

That or my recent addiction to correcting people when they use "less" when they should use "fewer"

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

You've been Affected by something, not Effected, you enimal.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

No ticket, no support.

Even if it is for batteries for your wireless keyboard and mouse. Ticket please.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Beans don't belong in chili.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Brioche is an inferior burger bun.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WammKD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Funny; probably the opposite of yours.

Facing the toilet paper outward increases the chance that the paper rips with the roll being in such a position that the loose portion of the roll is lying exactly against the roll: I don't want to have to spin the roll to be able to get to the loose bit. Having the loose bit closer to the wall – probably by virtue of being further away from the user – more often results in it being ripped such that a bit is hanging below the roll, making it easier to grab more often. It's, in total, a much more consistently enjoyable user experience.

Also, less being constrained only to countable objects is an artificial and unintuitive definition. It's not like further vs. farther, describing two distinct concepts which never overlap. Fewer is in reference to counting by individual elements so it wouldn't make sense to apply to things which aren't inherently segmented but it's entirely possibly to measure less of the total of a segmented collection. To say less milk is to take a reduction of the total amount of milk available; this is perfectly feasible with a segmented collection, like cookies. To say less cookies is to take a reduction of the total amount of cookies, something fully measurable and actionable. It is merely that fewer is applicable to a subset of the things which less is applicable.

To argue otherwise is to try and create an artificial construction against the intuitive logic inherent in the natural construction.

I had not realized the latter was a hill I'd die on but, boy, will I, now.

[–] Onionguy@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

The toilet paper roll has to be placed so the tear off sheet faces the shitting person, and not the wall.

[–] jg1i@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
  • Syllabuses, not syllabi
  • Matrixes, not matrices
  • Indexes, not indices
  • Cactuses, not cacti

Standardize plurals!

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Okay Imma pick a fight here. Your suggestion is the opposite of pedantic. It advocates for a "vulgarisation" of Latin loanwords (in the sense of "making them more like common words").

I want to go back to pluralising more words in line with their Greek or Latin roots. I want to reverse the perfectly natural and reasonable linguistic shift you're proposing and instead restore or retain that piece of linguistic anachronism as long as possible.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

This is the way.

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think you mean "Greek or Latin rootices".

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

I got out-pedanted? Impossibile!

Bene factum

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›