this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
53 points (92.1% liked)

science

14712 readers
541 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I took a poke at the abstract of the paper, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07759-5, and its been a few years since I have done carrier grade wireless but.....

The low-loss and broadband beamformer enables a 72-Gbps chip-to-chip wireless link over 300 mm and eight simultaneous 40-Gbps wireless links

I can't be reading this right? They got 72Gb/s over 30cm?
I would love to see where this tech goes and I realise these papers are using ideal circumstance, but I don't see this being used in a meaningful way.

Hope I am wrong though.

[–] 4am@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Is that a type for 300nm? In other words, electromagnetic radiation that sits just below infrared and just above microwave.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Given the state of fiber, I'm not optimistic.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

And given the standards of new movies, what's the benefit of a faster download?

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

And youtube will still figure out how to fuck up the buffer