this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
545 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59446 readers
3569 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Imagine your car playing you an ad based on your destination, vehicle information—and listening to your conversations.

Ford has patented a system that, per the filing, would use several different sources of information to customize ad content to play in your car. One such information stream that this hypothetical system would use to determine what sort of ads to serve could be could be the voice commands you’ve given to the car. It could also identify your voice and recognize you and your ad preferences, and those of your passengers. Finally, it could listen to your conversations and determine if it’s better to serve you a visual ad while you’re talking, or an audio ad when there’s a lull in the conversation.

If the system described in the patent knew that you were headed to the mall on the freeway based on destination information from the nav system and vehicle speed, it could consider how many ads to serve in the time you’ll be in the car, and whether to serve them on a screen or based through the audio system. If you respond more positively to audio ads, it might serve you more of those—how does every five minutes sound?

But what if the weather’s bad, traffic is heavy, and you’re chatting away with your passenger? Ford describes the system using the external sensors to perceive traffic levels and weather, and the internal microphone to understand conversational cadence, to “regulate the number (and relevance) of ads shown” to the occupants. Using the GPS, if it knows you’ve parked near a store, it might serve you ads relevant to that retail location. Got passengers? Maybe you get an audio ad, and they get a visual one.

Given how consumers feel about advertising and in-car privacy, it is difficult to imagine an implementation of this system that wouldn’t generate blowback. But again, the patent isn’t describing some imminent implementation; it just protects Ford’s IP that describes a possible system. That said, with the encroachment of subscription-based features, perhaps it’s only a matter of time before you’re accepting a $20/month discount to let your new Ford play you ads on your commute.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zulu@lemmy.world 87 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Honestly good. Let no one else use that technology. Then all i have to do is not buy a ford.

That said, if you plug your phone into your car, this tech is already in place lol.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This is not how patents work. At all.

For one, patent owners are generally more than happy to license their technology to integrators, and even competitors, if there is money to be made.

More importantly, patents cannot be used to get exclusivity on products. Rather, patents can only protect novel approaches to how a product is made or served.

The patent system is designed to protect R&D costs exclusively, not some get out of jail card for anti trust. Of course, the patent office isn't perfect, the system does get abused in anti-competitive ways. But in the end, it's rare that that results in less consumer choice, because of licensing deals.

[–] Zulu@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, the "let no one else use it" portion of my comment is what i meant when you say "patent owners are generally more than happy to license their tech"

I hope ford doesn't.

And yes while patents dont grant exclusivity it gives a company the option to try and argue that a competitors version isnt novel enough. In the USA, where ford is from, patent law screwery is abounds if you have enough money. Of which Ford is backed by the US government.

Im not here to point out whether or not the patent is the issue. The problem is the spying and selling of personal data. If ford proceeds in a way that limits that exposure to the rest of car manufacturers then fantastic, even if its only in a nominal way.

I do still appreciate your refresher on how patents work though! Hope the rest of your day goes well.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Same sentiment. I hope this patent rots so deep in their patent system that the hard drives turn to dust.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 55 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Me: I'll just need a screwdriver and a hammer to chisel that shit off the motherboard from the radio 📻.....

Ford: actually it's an integral part of the fuel pump, the fuel injection timing system, the breaking system and the battery BMS system...and the head light controller...it's in all vital systems!

Me: check out my all new Honda!

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe there's a way to dumb down the technology with 1950s bypasses. Just skip the computer entirely.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"How to lobotomize your car" could become a whole new genre on youtube.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 40 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Do they not realize this will hurt their Brand?

Short term ad profits aren't worth losing customers.

[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They very much are for a lot of people. Lines goes up, you can give yourself a nice bonus payout and if things come crashing down you leave. With your golden parachute of course.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

In general, digital privacy invasions have been very successful because of attrition.

Most people don't care, those that do hold out, but then every competitor does the same and you no longer have any real alternatives. Eventually, the hold outs need to replace [car in this case] and the sting of the objectiknable change has faded, and they just move on.

Rinse and repeat.

We lost the fight for meaningful net neutrality, basic digital privacy rights, broadband limits, etc.

They'll win this one too. Eventually. Your phones and IoT with microphones are already doing it.

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I guess they might lose customers, but the ad revenue will offset it. Which could be a win for them. Less cars to produce for the same amount of money. If they survive everybody else will probably just follow suit. Like the car functionality subscriptions.

I'm just sad we reached this point.

Ban targeted advertising. Ban data gathering. You won't even have to deal with the f***ing cookie banners anymore.

If they survive

And if they show the slightest sign that they might not survive then the US Gov will bail them out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No, because the barrier to entry for car manufacturing is significant.

If the other major car manufacturers weren't already working a similar advertising system/platform, they've already scheduled multiple meetings to catch up.

This isn't a problem that will be solved by the market and competition, only by regulation.

And I don't consider tech savvy users learning how to hack and disable these features as a resolution, it's just mitigation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This means my car will be cheaper, right?

...right?

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 7 points 2 months ago

"Ahahahaha! You silly bitch..."

--Giant corporations

[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

Give me a free car and I'll test it out with this "service". I'm not buying a car that advertises to me.

[–] Swampman@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Lets hope this is one of those patents that they never do anything with while simultaneously denying everyone else the opportunity to do it.

Like that 2009 Sony patent that makes you get up from your seat and yell out the name of the brand to end an ad.

[–] chwilson@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

drink a verification can to continue

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I really hope my car holds out for a long time, because fuck ads in my car. I don't want my car to listen to anything but the controls I use to drive.

Is there really anybody who thinks they would like that?

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is there really anybody who thinks they would like that?

Auto companies don't care what people like, only what level of BS people would put up with before going to a different brand.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Companies don't care what people like, only what level of BS people would put up with before going to a different brand.

Ftfy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

Of all the amazing futures that technology could bring us, this is the black hell we get stuck with.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

NEW feature: As you drive down the road, Ford cars will automatically take over and drive you to the nearest sponsor location. Hungry? It will take over and swerve into the nearest KFC drive-thru. Next stop, CVS pharmacy, then Office Depot.

Disclaimer: Disabling AutoAd feature requires monthly subscription.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

"But honey, the car took me to the strip club, it isn't my fault"

[–] simonced@lemmy.one 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There was an article saying that ppl don't buy enough EVs, but with all the shit they put in it, the problem is beyond the type of engine...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I'm already sick of ads at gas station pumps, and will just sit in my car in order to avoid them.

[–] Askundilras@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Ads at the pump? What do you live? Luckily I haven't seen them in Germany yet. Guess it's only a matter of time..

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

Oh just wait. They are motivating me further to go electric. Very widespread across the US and very loud. Despite what people love to say about mute buttons on forums, many do not have a mute option.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

what if i screamed 'fuck off and die' at it whenever an ad plays

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 12 points 2 months ago

It would recognize that you don't respomd well to ads and play more annoying ones as a result.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Would I buy that car? Would not drive, even if given to me for free. Hell Naw.

https://youtu.be/8QxIIz1yEsA?si=CbTlD86trZ7wOK9W&t=220

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

They would have to pay me to ride around in that. Cash ass or grass Ford

[–] cirkuitbreaker@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StarshotJohn@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Will they turn it off when you test drive? I bet there will be some nefarious test drive mode that doesn't show how fucked the car's systems are.

[–] norimee@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

I hate this timeline.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

No. 1 upgrade for future Ford cars: A switch to cut off the microphone.

[–] r_deckard@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Destination: Las Vegas

Ford car: "Visit Hard-on Henry's for hookers and blow"

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yet another reason not to buy a Ford.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I've got 37 other reasons and they're all recalls. Seriously, that's just this year. They've had the most recalls of any manufacturer like 4 years running. At this point my whole family likes to joke that my brother's got job security out the whazoo.

[–] ironcrotch@aussie.zone 8 points 2 months ago

Pi-hole coming to cars now

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Actually this is a good thing. They've gone and got a patent for it, so now I know not to buy ford cars, and no one else can spy on me without breaking copyright, because that's the part that would be illegal.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Unless they make a deal behind closed doors

[–] marzhall@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Finally I can add to the list:

  • Fix Or Repair Daily
  • Found On Road Dead

and now,

  • Frequently Off Recording Device
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 6 points 2 months ago

So now you have to disconnect and reinstall speakers and radio systems in new cars, got it

[–] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

Love my 2nd gen Toyota. Runs well. Needs just basic maintenance. It can hold it's own in any "Made in Murica" pissing contest. And the only annoying thing is the TPMS sensor light, if you could even call that annoying. It's manual, 4wd, doesn't record me, no backtalk. As loyal as a truck can be.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I already never wanted a Ford, now I want one even less.

[–] OmgItBurns@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

If/when this happens it will just lead to a rise in aftermarket products to disable the feature.

Hell, since they will probably use AI to parse the audio you can probably use it to fuck with your friends. Like when people would put out hyper-specific FB ads but via cars.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›