this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
71 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

58123 readers
4085 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Would be great to have a functional healthcare system instead of relying on trillion dollar companies charging us too much for healthcare ~~protects~~ products made by children.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TbF a medical device company would charge even more, they would be twice as ugly and they would probably suck at playing music.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

TBF it wouldn't in a functional healthcare system.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TbF assuming you are talking about US, my pet unicorn could just heal me with her laser eyes as this is slightly more likely to happen than a functional healthcare system.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

For a brief moment, we made a lot of money for our investors from less ugly, way more exclusionary tech.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You would rather be indirectly gouged by a no-name brand that creates an inferior one-off product than buy an Apple product.

This is the hill you chose and no amount of government healthcare can save you from it.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

My mother already has bluetooth in ear hearing aids that you cannot see. Quit jerking off Apple, edgelord.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cool. Every tech paper I've read has said how terrible their hearing aids are compared to AirPods, so your anecdote is meaningless.

Also, did that hearing aid retail for under $300?

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Clent@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tech papers are not anecdotal.

You will never regret or acknowledge the error.

Enjoy your hill.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Can we have links to said papers?

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Would be great to have a body that wasn't prone to malfunction and degradation at every single opportunity... But yeah I guess that government stuff should be fixed too

[–] li10@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago

About ten years too late for me, tinnitus go ^eeeeeeeeeee^

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fuck you Apple. You patent-trolled Bluetooth hearing aids for a decade so people couldn't use it unless they bought your overpriced shit

Go shite in your hands and clap, cunts

[–] CandleTiger@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago

First I’m hearing this claim — what did Apple do to Bluetooth hearing aids? My mother has been using Bluetooth hearing aids for a couple years now that have nothing to do with Apple, are you saying Apple was standing in the way of that?

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I've never heard of this insult before, but it's fucking great

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 3 points 1 week ago

I always wondered why it didn't exist until now...