this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
41 points (90.2% liked)

Android

17398 readers
392 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's too darn expensive for what it does. I'll stick with my $350 phone and a laptop or tablet for now.

[–] kuneho@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

The thing about foldables is that they are great and great for a while now - hardware wise. Like, my Fold 4 is amazing. The hole when it's closed is a bit strange, but now they managed to close these phones technically flushed - so the only "real" problem disappeared.

the software side of things is what more important. how the OS handles the two (or three) and foldable screens.

It's nice that Google too is pushing this market. This means the support for folding screens will be eventually completely baked into the OS and the manufacturers don't have to hack up apps and services for it.

Now we need people to buy these to make the tech even more cheap and better. Though, if I look into the future in a kind of sci-fi glasses, folding and flexible screens are evident so I think we will be there eventually.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Now we need people to buy these to make the tech even more cheap and better.

No, we need the tech to be cheaper and better for me to buy it. This isn't my problem, the stuff is just not in a price segment where I can afford it.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

I'm waiting for it to get to Westworld quality haha

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

the software side of things is what more important

Nice thing about that is software is updatable, I find it silly when people say the hardware is nice, but the software isn't there so nope. As if the software was as permanent as the hardware lol

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

As if the software was as permanent as the hardware lol

There's no guarantee that the software will ever be updated to something that the user finds usable though.

Google could just one day go "meh, we don't think folding displays are where we want to be right now", and - ta-da! - you're left with a folding doorstop and Google's got yet another entry on the "killed by Google" list.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

That's true, but Google Pixels are also one of the few remaining US brands that allows you to somewhat freely unlock the BL

So custom roms can easily be had, in fact GrapheneOS is one that specifically targets Pixels in general

It's the 2nd biggest reason I didn't jump onto the Foldy bandwagon with Samshit (#1 being how damn narrow the cover screen is)

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Everyone of my phones aged out from lack of OS updates, not because the hardware failed or was too slow.

I have a box of them.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's a valid concern, though. The tablet experience has always sucked on Android, so the foldable experience is trying to hybridize with something the OS has never been able to get right.

But the inverse is also true. There's no telling if a future software update will take a good experience and make it terrible.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's true, but software is software, it can be modified by end users to suit their needs, especially on Pixel foldables which are one of the few remaining US brands that still somewhat freely allow you to unlock the bootloader.

So in that case with an unlockable BL, one could even flash a custom ROM that fixes any issues

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Of course, but I think when people complain about the software, it's that out-of-the-box experience they are describing. The vast majority of users are not savvy enough to flash custom ROMs, sideload, or even install a new launcher. And even for those with the expertise to do so, it's extra work.

But then that also doesn't quite address the app situation either. Android, for better or worse, is all about scalable interfaces to accommodate an infinitely wide array of devices, but most people with a tablet will tell you that they don't like "tablet" apps that are just rescaled phone apps with way too much whitespace. So there may be something to be said about the way Apple maintains iPad OS separately from iOS, with more stringent design standards to adhere to for app developers to have their iPad apps listed in their app store.