this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
277 points (98.9% liked)

PC Gaming

12389 readers
493 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 127 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Breaking Linux support after-the-fact ought to be grounds for a full refund (no matter how much time or hours of play have passed). Valve ought to allow such refunds and forcibly debit Rockstar's Steam publisher account, whether Rockstar likes it or not.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago

Same thing happened for the whole Bioshock series. They rolled out the update just over 2 weeks after a big sale so it was beyond the standard refund policy too.

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Rockstar doesn't officially support Linux though... So it's on valve that they certified it for steam deck. There's no grounds for charging that back to r*

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree. I bought a game for all the features it had at the time of buying it. There is no avenue for a consumer to push back against publishers changing that

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

While if you bought it, it should be source included and you should be able to host your own servers/pick any patch to play on

We don’t have those consumer protections because software is a relatively new thing

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The first generation of software for early stored-program digital computers in the late 1940s

80 years isn't "new"

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It really wasn’t a consumer constant in the 40s

[–] FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Well they are still selling in-game money without letting anyone know that they possibly cannot use it. But guess what rockstar, if I have to choose between your games and Linux, Linux wins every time. Later...

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you can't play online might as well pirate it

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

BattleEye can't stop scripting mod hacks in any other game I've ever played using it and that's the number one kind of cheat used in GTA V. 🤦‍♂️

[–] yaMatt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's super interesting. It would not be the first time Rockstar have put measures in place on GTA Online for them to be completely ineffective.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 26 points 1 year ago

Article update:

Update #1 - 14:31 UTC: Rockstar have now put up an official FAQ for BattlEye where they state:

Is BattlEye compatible with Steam Deck?

Steam Deck does not support BattlEye for GTA Online. You will be able to play GTAV Story Mode but unable to play GTA Online.

Note: GTAV and GTA Online are not officially supported on Steam Deck and all technical support questions should be directed to Valve’s Steam Deck support content and community.

I'm still currently waiting for an official statement from Rockstar on any plans to enable it, since BattlEye as mentioned below is supported on Linux / Steam Deck.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm glad I never played GTA V for the multiplayer. The load times were enough to make me lose interest.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not afraid to admit that I played the game a lot and that shit cost me weeks of my life. I'd usually watch MSNBC videos on the second screen while the other one was showing the clouds above LS.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I did like the racing in the game but the load time was too unbearable. I think I only logged like three hours into GTA online before I dropped it completely.

[–] PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well I wasn't planning on playing GTA 5 but now I guess it'll have to be pirated GTA 5 only so I can play a pre-anticheat version. It sucks that GTA is a game where all the mod developers try hard to make their stuff not work on pirated versions. Guess I'll be avoiding that entire toxic community as a whole. Cyberpunk a better game anyway.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A few months ago, I would be very upset about this, but the game kinda got old a while ago.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if online play will actually be tolerable now.

[–] normonator@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

So I wonder what my copy from rockstar will do now, it worked like a week ago under wine(single player). I bought it before it was available on steam unfortunately.

That said gta online was never good so idgaf about that part but Battle eye isnt going to do shit so sucks for those that do care.