this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6622 readers
455 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

We invaded Iraq on the pretense that they were getting yellowcake from Nigerian suppliers, and US suppliers were in Nigeria trying to sell yellowcake to Saddam Hussein. He wasn't interested.

We knew he wasn't interested because Joseph Wilson, a US diplomat, was involved in the efforts to make the sale. Hussein saw which way the wind was blowing.

When George W. Bush started talking about invading Iraq (in speeches blending vitriol against Hussein and anger over 9/11) Wilson published a report about how Hussein totally wasn't buying Yellowcake, which he knew about. And in response, the Bush administration burned Valerie Plame, who was Wilson's wife and an actual CIA operative who was active and abroad.

She made it home safely, and could no longer work as a CIA operative. In the cold war, burning a spy for political reasons showed CIA you were careless, and deserved to receive a tape of ten hours of your loved one screaming as she was tortured to death. But those were different times, and presidents then had a few more scruples (and knew not to do that).

According to Al Franken, about 75% of ground troops during the Iraq war believed they were there as revenge for the 9/11 attacks, even though Hussein and Iraq had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks. A friend of mine in Virginia noted his teen daughter was taught in American History we were provoked to go into Iraq because of the 9/11 attacks and the International War on Terror. I was around in 2003 watching Republicans nation wide saying torture is AOK and waterboarding isn't really torture (until they went to have a SERE guy waterboard them for size. They all thought it was pretty terrible and even maybe torturous). Still, it was pretty clear that the IWoT and Iraq were separate things, even though the White House liked to conflate the two in speeches. Hussein and Al-Qaeda did not get along.

I remember the US attacked Iraq because Hussein allegedly had WMDs. The US couldn't find any. The US had strong intel beforehand there were no WMDs in Iraq and that Iraq was still recovering from the 1990-1991 gulf war.

I think George W. Bush and Dick Cheney just wanted to kill and torture some Arabs for being too brown and because they couldn't kill Saudis (like Osama Bin Laden, who figured largely in planning the 9/11 attacks). All the WMD nonsense was a deliberate lie.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

They wanted to look like they were doing something in retaliation for 9/11.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Russia's WMD can reach North America, that's why.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

there's a difference between WMDs that work and rube goldberg war crime machines. why do you think all serious militaries ditched chemical weapons and go balls deep into PGMs? hint: it's not for humanitarian reasons

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

True, but let's not pretend that we actually found any substantial WMDs. We found 34 tons of mustard gas. At the time, the US had the most VX gas in the world.

[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

every time VX gets mentioned i inevitably end up in a Wikipedia rabbit hole, it's now been one and a half hours

[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And in theory they have enough working ones that at least one is guaranteed to slip through defenses

[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

If you assume all Russian subs and planes can be sunk / shot down before they release their payloads, there's still over 3000 land based ICBM warheads. There is no terminal phase missile defense system. Majority of the land based warheads will reach terminal phase. The extrapolation that the events in Ukraine mean that nuclear exchange between the two biggest nuclear nations is somehow survivable is both dumb and dangerous.

[–] Hlodwig@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Say no more, we (french) didnt invade Irak cause they didnt had WMD, so we will invade Russia because they have WMD!

And somehow, for some reason, you will rename french fries as: "Oppression fries".

[–] adj16@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why did you use this meme template and then make literally no reference to its conversation

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

OP right now

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

This is not fair, Ukraine got to invade them, we should get to too!

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

As much as I think the Iraq situation was total bullshit, there's a difference between just beginning to develop nuclear weapons, and having a massive stockpile of functional nuclear weapons.