this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
17 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1374 readers
254 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The team points to glass’ optical properties and its “infinite recyclability” as reasons for turning to the material.

Study: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40940-024-00279-8

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have a lot of questions. Why 3D print if everything is just going to be the same shape? And how do pieces shaped like 8ts snap together?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Because shoving the words "3D printing" into your proposal is how you get the grant money.

Also, actually doing the work to confirm that the common-sense intuition (that 3D printing glass blocks is kinda dumb) is correct is legitimate science.

[–] Imacat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

The study also looked at casting the blocks. The cast ones were stronger but they noted some problems with their printing process.

They mention a lot of the usual upsides of 3d printing. It’s easy to iterate on a design, easy to modify to a particular need, and allows for geometry that’s impossible for other methods.

They snap together kinda like 2x1 legos.