this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
6 points (87.5% liked)

Greentext

4377 readers
1832 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I understand cheating is shitty but it would make a lot more sense for the teacher to make this a teachable moment about cheating, and to promote collaborative solutions, but also checking work you get from others.

A huge part of development is copying code and reusing code from libraries. The important part is that you know how the code you copy works.

[–] EmilyIsTrans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Their teachable moment is that plagiarism has consequences, and they earned that lesson entirely by themselves.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Teachable moments" are for freshmen. Cheating seniors can get fucked.

On a very related note, I actually earned my CS degree.

[–] sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

As someone who only cheated in one class because the professor was a lazy fuck and assigned 5 hours worth of problems for a 1 hour exam with no regard to whether it was completable, I agree. The whole class cheated, because they had to. We actually all knew the material really well because distributing that material across 20 students was still iffy on time.

He's dead now, the lazy fuck. Fuck you Dr. Aung.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

On the one hand: awww, poor cheater world's smallest violin meme

On the other hand: expulsion from the university for a first offense seems... harsh.

This is why fizzbuzz exists

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You are the Devil.

I mean you really are, you tempted people into sin and then laughed as they were damned for it.

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

when a professor does this they're "based" and "brainpilled" but when I pretend to sell crack on the benches outside, all of a sudden the judge claims it's "entrapment" and "illegal" smh....

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

At this point I'm only hoping to emerge from the other side of the "based" fad although I've never understood what it meant. WTaF is "brain pilled"?

Groovy. Tubular. Fetch.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Here's the real answer for based:

"Based" (corruption of base head - from someone who smokes base - street name for crack cocaine) was popular as an insult in rap / African American circles in the early 00s

Rapper Lil B got called it and decided on a whim to pretend the meaning was changed to mean something positive, started using it in this way, it caught on - mostly through the new York scene and its attendant twitter following

As all slang does in the last ~100-150 years, passed from black people to everyone.


Brain pilled is a reference to The Matrix f/t Keanu Reeves in which Morpheus - whose namesake is the God of dreams - offers to wake up Neo from his fake reality by taking the red pill - leading to the phrase "red pilled" meaning (a right wing variant of) "woke." 

Over time [x]-pilled became slang like how Watergate/ [x]-gate became a suffix to imply an imbrolglio.
[–] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I always thought "based" was a contraction of "based on facts and logic" (or similar)

[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Cheating in academia is the name of the game. There is a survivor bias here assuming the other 78 students didn't cheat. They're Learning how to not get caught. Building a better trap may simply yield a better better cheater. The proof ends up being in the work.

I still think honeypots are amusing AF.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

At a certain point though, you've just plain done the work. If you jump through enough hoops to cheat then you have to know the material well enough. Like doing a bunch of editing passes on downloaded papers.

[–] Magrath@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Isn't this basically the same thing as entrapment?

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Entrapment is coercing someone into committing a crime they wouldn't have otherwise.

This was a honeypot. A bait for those who were already looking to cheat.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

There's no evidence that those who cheated were already going to.

The prof said it was only suspected that students were cheating, and instead of investigating and collecting evidence, he fabricated evidence through his own encouragement of the same crime he seeks to denounce.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Entrapment is basically associated with an implied threat, with that threat people do things they normally wouldn't, if there was no threat then it's less likely to be considered entrapment.

Also entrapment only matters for criminal justice, you getting fucked at university for cheating isn't going to care about how entrapment works.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

I didn't mean to argue that it's entrapment specifically. I do think that the prof was in wrong, though.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago

Mfw anon starts greentext with "be me". Can’t you find another opener.