this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
148 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10186 readers
749 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

House Republicans unveiled a budget blueprint proposing trillions in spending cuts over 10 years, targeting steep reductions to Medicaid and food assistance programs. The plan seeks $2 trillion in Medicaid cuts and $800 billion from SNAP. It also calls for establishing a commission to propose changes to Social Security and Medicare. Democrats criticized the proposal as pushing "cruel cuts" that will hurt access to healthcare and raise costs for many. If enacted, the budget would slash nearly $5 trillion from discretionary spending and $9 trillion from mandatory programs over a decade. However, the proposal is unlikely to become law given Democratic control of the Senate. The resolution indicates Republicans remain committed to large cuts across many public services and low-income programs.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stefenauris@pawb.social 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why can't we cut military spending instead? It's definitely going to shitty contractors and not to veteran health care anyway

The MIC will never release it's chokehold on the House; both Ds and Rs support bills to raise the DoD's budget.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago

They couldn't pass a military spending bill today either.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We only spend about 3% of our gdp on defense. That’s below most other countries. We are obligated to spend at least 2% due to treaty obligations.

[–] TommySalami@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Only? The US accounts for 40% of all military spending in the world. We are at nearly 3 times second place, China, $876 billion to $290 billion. Considering the US has the most billionaires and compilation of billionaire wealth, I really don't think GDP is the great earmark you are portraying it as.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And? We only have the largest gdp and a professional army.

GDP is the standard used.

Look at Ukraine and you will see the money has been well spent. A small country has been able to fight off a previous super power for over a year.

That’s only with a 3% spend. So I fully support the military as it also paid for my education.

[–] Poggervania@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

GDP isn’t the end-all be-all for economic performance. Consider that real estate also contributes to GDP, and we have been getting some fucking expensive housing in recent years. It doesn’t equate to more money, so it’s effectively padding our GDP. All GDP does is give a rough estimation of how much a country is valued at best, and at worst it’s a padding game to show who has the biggest number.

If you want a good indicator for how well a country is doing economically, CPI is a better start than GDP - which, by the way, China is fucking decimating the US in that regard. Their reported CPI is around 100 points while the US is at around 300 points. You generally want lower CPI as it indicates inflation if it’s super high like the US.

[–] Dominic@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Subtract the “defense” costs that are paid for by other means in most of the world (healthcare, education, medical research), adjust the rest for purchasing power parity, and get back to me on that.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

its what jesus would do, after all

[–] milkjug@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Also Republicans:

Folks, let me tell you, Jesus was a great guy, the best. When he started preaching, the people loved him. Tremendous crowds. Nobody got crowds like Jesus. Sadly, the fake news media of the time didn't want to cover him. They said he was a radical. Can you believe it?

When Pontius Pilate, not a good guy, said he found no guilt in Jesus, the crowd went crazy. They wanted Barabbas released instead, a real criminal. Total loser. Pilate should have stood up to them. Weak! In the end, they crucified our Lord and Savior. A total witch hunt. It was a perfect resurrection, many are saying the best. Many people are still talking about it.

Can you believe the apostles? Losers, everyone said. But they went out and started this little religion. Now, two thousand years later, it's the biggest deal in the world. Paul went all over spreading the word. A real worker. They didn't have planes back then, can you believe it? He walked everywhere.

The Bible folks, it's a great book, the best. People are always asking me, they say, "Sir, what's your favorite book?" And I say the Bible. It's got the best stories, the best morals. Nobody knows the Bible like me. I know it better than anybody.

I'll leave it at that. The New Testament, it's something very special. I'm proud to be a Christian.

(Courtesy of GPT)

[–] milkjug@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Folks, let me tell you, Jesus was a great guy, the best. When he started preaching, the people loved him. Tremendous crowds. Nobody got crowds like Jesus. Sadly, the fake news media of the time didn't want to cover him. They said he was a radical. Can you believe it?

When Pontius Pilate, not a good guy, said he found no guilt in Jesus, the crowd went crazy. They wanted Barabbas released instead, a real criminal. Total loser. Pilate should have stood up to them. Weak! In the end, they crucified our Lord and Savior. A total witch hunt. It was a perfect resurrection, many are saying the best. Many people are still talking about it.

Can you believe the apostles? Losers, everyone said. But they went out and started this little religion. Now, two thousand years later, it's the biggest deal in the world. Paul went all over spreading the word. A real worker. They didn't have planes back then, can you believe it? He walked everywhere.

The Bible folks, it's a great book, the best. People are always asking me, they say, "Sir, what's your favorite book?" And I say the Bible. It's got the best stories, the best morals. Nobody knows the Bible like me. I know it better than anybody.

I'll leave it at that. The New Testament, it's something very special. I'm proud to be a Christian.

(Courtesy of GPT)

[–] Behaviorbabe@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republicans can go fuck themselves, how about that?

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

They technically are, since Republican states keep voting for these guys

[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 33 points 1 year ago

Republicans want to punish the poor.. but tax cuts for the filthy rich.. such pieces of shit, I sure hope the karma train runs over these motherfuckers

[–] ef9357@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

How about we cut the salaries of all elected officials in DC to zero? They don’t work for us so why should they get paid out of our tax dollars? They get paid plenty by whoring themselves to the highest bidder.

[–] Poggervania@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Because this only harms the ones who aren’t corrupt and doesn’t do anything for the ones who are corrupt.

What they should be doing is getting rid of lobbying and disallowing corporate and business interests in politics, but we fucked that up decades ago, so I’ll settle for forcing politicians to wear tracksuits that have patches from every single person and company that had paid them.

[–] HumbleFlamingo@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No.

The elected officials who actually give a shit about you and are trying to help aren't millionaires and this will severely impact them.

The elected officials who don't give a shit if you die starving in the gutter are already millionaires and won't give a shit about their salary.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

They also don't get paid much. The real money's in the bribes and insider trading

[–] ViciousTurducken@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The actual answer is that not paying your public officials makes them even more susceptible to corruption.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Yup. I'd rather if failure to create budgets was defined as failure to enact their duty and then we held new elections.

[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

So you want them to be bought out... more?

[–] upstream@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The solution is to create a system where their political prostitution is both illegal and unnecessary.

That’s the only way you get to shift politicians into working for “the people” and not their backers.

https://youtu.be/PJy8vTu66tE

Obviously not a guarantee, but if they could stop spending 40% of their time worrying about being re-elected and financing their re-election that would probably be a boon. Maybe they could even read some of the legislation they’re passing.

Even after fixing this issue you have the other one where you have a shitload of politicians which seems to be members of a cult, not a political organization and millions of Americans voting for them.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

You vote them out. Unfortunately you are just one person in one district. But volunteering for campaigns of people you believe in, and donating to their campaign fund are two ways to help.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 16 points 1 year ago

How the fuck aren't you guys hunting them for sport

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago

They won't be able to pass it and even if they did it will go nowhere in the Senate. They know this. There will be a shutdown.

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Is this the same GOP that's worried about losing 'trillions and trillions of dollars' over 'a tiny fraction of CO2 in the atmosphere' in the name of climate change? They truly are a bunch of devilish scumbags without whom the world would be infinitely more pleasant.