this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
52 points (85.1% liked)

politics

19101 readers
3444 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This motherfucker is not currently an elected politician. Why the fuck is a civilian having meetings and making deals with foreign leaders? I was asking myself that when he met with Netanyahu.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act

He's explicitly broken this law many times.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

It isn't uncommon for a presidential candidate to meet with foreign leaders to discuss what may happen after they're elected. In the case of Ukraine, they need to know what to expect in the event Trump is elected. They're fighting a war, and it'd be a really bad idea to continue in ignorance.

He's done plenty of bad and illegal things, but this is fairly normal.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm surprised Zelenskyy met with him at all. It's hard for me to think of a reason why this wouldn't be an aggravating waste of his time.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He has to.

Obviously Zelenskyy wants Kamala to win. That is the only real hope Ukraine has short of a civil war in russia (that will have knock on effects. But the race is still infuriatingly close. And trump liking Zelenskyy might be the difference between widespread ethnic cleansings and... just half of Ukraine getting genocided.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I guess that's the pageantry of politics, but in more pragmatic terms it's pretty clear where Trump falls. Zelenskyy specifically is on Trump's shitlist because he didn't play ball with his "dirt on the Bidens" scheme. And Trump is transparently compromised by Putin in one way or another, and is going to rule warmly in favor of Ukraine's abuser no matter what.

Any other nuance or angle that could be worked is literally beyond Trump's reasoning or memory. A waste of time.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

Its not "politics"

It is leadership. The people of Ukraine aren't idiots. They understand that a LOT of their military and intelligence support has come from the US and that a US that is opposed to that means a severe lack of resources and pressure against the rest of NATO to do the same.

Does anyone expect a "win" to come out of talks with trump? No. But it says a lot to have a leader who is willing to try to lessen the loss.

The Internet has a tendency to like to discuss things in a clinical and idealistic sorkin-esqe manner. That isn't how life works. Sometimes you can't save everyone but you can at least try to save some people.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago

Zelenskyy meeting with Trump is just Zelenskyy meeting with Putin with extra steps.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

It's unclear who'll win the next US election. Zelensky wants support from whomever wins. Zelensky therefore has met with all the candidates who have a chance to win to try and bolster the chances of continued support.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

"So do I not exist or what?"

-The Logan Act

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Sure he will, right after infrastructure week, his health care plan and after he releases his tax returns

[–] Today@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Concepts of plans...

[–] vanontom@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

In this case, Pootytang has developed the plan, so it probably exists. It would probably work out as well as Donnie's previous master negotiations with terrorists.

It's gonna feel great to vote and finally terminate his presidency, then watch the cult lose their minds, fracture and fade into oblivion (or prison).

[–] CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who the fuck cares if any deal is good for Russia?

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Russian agents and their useful idiots.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

"I’ll tell you my plan but only after I’m elected." -terminal sex pest and criminal

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Trump already negotiated his deal. It was "give me dirt on hunter Biden or we will delay arms shipments while Russia swallows you."

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

LOLRIIIGHT.

Just like abortion bans are what everybody wanted.

Absolute fucking moron.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

It's the old Nixon playback. "I have a secret plan to end the war in Vietnam."

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And he'll solve Gaza right after that! Sure gramps. Time for bed.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I'm sure he thinks he will, and he's right in a way, once Ukraine is integrated into Russia then what's good for Russia is good for Russia.

And what's good for Russia is another Holodomor.

[–] zib@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

We'll probably hear about this details of this deal around the same time he has that healthcare plan ready. Any day now, I'm sure of it.

[–] elgordino@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago

Concepts of a deal

[–] cristo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Trump made great strides with North Korea that ammounted to absolutely nothing, this would turn out exactly the same. A big ol nothingburger, or he could just make it worse by allowing Russia to annex large swaths of Ukraine that they already lost in the counteroffensive.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

NBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for NBC News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/meeting-zelenskyy-trump-says-will-negotiate-ukraine-russia-deal-good-b-rcna172987
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support