this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6633 readers
1264 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The little cardboard nuke being tossed over is what kicked me in the happiness.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If their nukes are being maintained like their trucks I don't think they have any nukes

And considering the tritium necessary to use the nukes is $30 a gram I'm sure that turned into vodka a while ago.

[–] Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

tritium is probably slightly harder to sell to cousin yuri than motor oil

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Actually tritium has LOTS of uses besides thermonuclear weapons and there is good market for "discount" tritium.

[–] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Someone could keister a few grams and just walk through an airport, no?

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Doing that sounds like asking for ass cancer

[–] erin@lemmy.sidh.bzh 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

i think their nuke was maintained because US controlled them regularly and I think the US experts were able to distinguish between a fake nuke, a dangerously unmaintained nuke and a functioning nuke.

But that only concerns nuclear warheads. Can Putin send those heads? The latest tests of Satan II suggest that no 😏

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They don't need to send the warheads. Just the briefcase ones will do.

Fuck off right off with that briefcase shit, the only non-cringe nuke is the Davy Crockett. Russia's got fuck all to say to the atomic recoilless rifle of freedom.