Once more: "fetal cardiac activity" occurs before the fetus has a heart.
The cells that will become the heart start pulsing rhythmically before they are even a hollow space, let alone pumping blood.
You can see this in a petri dish.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Once more: "fetal cardiac activity" occurs before the fetus has a heart.
The cells that will become the heart start pulsing rhythmically before they are even a hollow space, let alone pumping blood.
You can see this in a petri dish.
Zebrafish need that rhythmic activity to form heart valves. They have unidirectional flow before the valves form, through some magic of resonance and pressure waves reflecting off arterial curves, and the resonance results in (IIRC) a stagnant spot where the valves will form. Do something to interfere with the mechanics and no valves form.
Sounds like we need laws in place protecting the life of zebra fish
That's gotta be a kick in the balls to trumps campaign right?
Read as the Padme and Skywalker meme.
It's full of sand?
This is excellent news.
However, the article is a bit light on the details. Like, was the state being sued? If so, who was suing them? Also, can this be appealed? Or is the legislature there going to have to try to pass a constitutional amendment allowing the practice of forced birth? I'll go look it up, but I just find it odd that none of that context was provided in the article.
EDIT: here's an article with more details and the full text of the judge's ruling: https://www.wabe.org/breaking-judge-rules-georgias-restrictive-abortion-law-unconstitutional/
It will likely be appealed. The case is:
SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE, on behalf of itself and its members et al. v. STATE OF GEORGIA
EDIT: AP is continuously updating the article, so I imagine that they'll probably add some or all of this context before long.
100% this happening sooner than later is better for the women of GA.
But politically speaking, I fear this will motivate a republican surge this close to the election.
But again, in no way would I put the future politics of the situation above the lives that will be impacted right now by this decision.
At the same time, Republican candidates will have to take a public stand against this, which may anger enough people to increase voter turnout.
That's a valid point too. [shrug] so there's just no predicting anything haha
Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Associated Press:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Search topics on Ground.News
https://apnews.com/article/georgia-abortion-law-struck-down-632db7d5de815efa18aea52dadbfc59b?taid=66fb04e3bd37650001ccb38a