From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
There is literally no way 98% of people even know what a browser is
"You know the app you use to connect to the internet? Would you like to be able to choose which app to use?"
"Cool, I'll mark you as yes, just like everyone else"
"You mean my email?"
More like: "You mean facebook?"
it's the blue e, right?
The button for the internet!
As a kid, I used to call IE "Saturn E". Ya know, cuz IE has a ring around it?
Yes, the percentage is high. Most people would be annoyed to have another selection screen in the setup process.
But I do think I saw more people using non-Google search engines since Google was forced to provide a search engine selection screen in the setup process.
my gf's mom ended up a firefox user because it had the cute fox logo, she didn't even know what it was called
That's so cute >.<
To me it sounds like an idea most people would say is a good idea because people like choice on principle, but the vast majority of people will then just use Chrome anyway.
But at least they can decide for themselves, even if it's just because of the logo. The friction to switch the browser after the fact is way too high, especially on mobile nearly all people use the default browser.
This is about Windows, why did you post it here?
The study is also about Android. But the main reason I crossposted here is because I was curious what the opinion of this community about browser screens in the setup process is.
Our research involved 12,000 people in Germany, Spain and Poland setting up a highly realistic virtual Windows or Android device.
https://research.mozilla.org/browser-competition/choicescreen/
Edit: I believe that this study is also applicable to desktop Linux users, since those are generally more tech-savy.
At least depending on the district, users can be sent directly to the store page.
Windows, however, needs a choice screen.
I've been trying Librewolf as a Flatpak on my work machine lately and it's going great! It's really a no-BS Firefox + privacy settings by default; love it. But in general I keep the default Firefox that come with my distro.
Librewolf doesn't respect my kde theme :(
I usually install like 4 browsers, and keep a chromium one for a few tabs that for whatever reason are hostile to the others
What percentage of users know what browser they want to use but also find the process of downloading and installing one complex?
If you are already using Linux, probably a pretty low percentage. Though I assume the older people who's children or grandchildren changed the OS on their PC/laptop to a distro that tries to mimic windows would find it complex.
I change it, because my distro came with pale moon browser which looks like something from the early 2000s
Out of curiosity, what distro comes with Pale Moon as the default browser?
I kept the default browser on my distro of choice but that was because firefox is my personal browser of choice anyways
Firefox hardened with Betterfox, Chromium for some sites which are broken because of ad/fingerprint blocker, firefox itself.
I use regular firefox and cromite on android
Same here, but on Linux I use a customized version of betterfox user.js
Do you keep the default browser on your Linux distro, or do you change it?
Void doesn't come with a default. I just use xbps to download Firefox on a fresh install.
I've never really understood this argument. The history of browsers shows that a browser choice screen isn't necessary. IE used to be dominant until it started sucking so much that people looked for alternatives. For a while that alternative was Firefox, then Chrome came along and people moved to that.
I think the problem for alternate browsers on PC is that all browsers are good enough at the things most people care about that they don't look at alternatives anymore. Most pre-built computers come with Chrome pre-installed and if it isn't, people seek it out on their own to download it. More savvy users know about Chrome's issues, but those aren't issues users really care about.
What does need to be addressed is how iOS and Windows either don't really allow you to use another browser, or make it difficult to switch. iOS needs to allow other rendering engines so alternative browsers aren't just a skin over Safari and Windows needs to stop with preventing users from changing the default browser for things like widgets.
The dominance of Internet Explorer had longstanding negative effect on the web. Even today there're industrial and internal banking applications that only run on IE, and nothing else. With Chromium being increasingly the only supported browser we soon won't have a choice which browser to use for certain websites anymore (e.g. Firefox).
IE's decline came to be because it was slow and didn't progress for many years, unlike Firefox at the time. With Google being interested in the continued development of the web this won't happen. Google pushes detrimental standards like "Web Environment Integrity API" today, they tried it with FLoC a while back. If Google succeeds in making the web more closed, another browser won't have a chance to catch up.
At this point we have only 3 mostly feature complete browser engines (Chromium's, Safari's and Firefox's). With Firefox declining it might soon only be 2 that work on all websites. It isn't good for an open standar if there're only few implementations.
With Chromium being increasingly the only supported browser we soon won't have a choice which browser to use for certain websites anymore (e.g. Firefox).
That’s where I disagree. I think that if we do get an internet where Chrome is the only option and it sucks, we’ll get another browser option. Firefox for example went through a few years of being a bad browser but it has gotten past those hurdles. People are lazy and change is slow, but once it starts I think it is unstoppable.
At work I use Ubuntu which comes with Firefox by default so yeah I use the default.
At home with arch I have to download one anyway ... so I use Firefox.
There has been only a brief period since I first started using Firefox that I used another browser as my main (chrome/chromium back when Netflix only worked on it properly) When Firefox rolled out "quantum" I jumped back never regretted it. Still one of the only remaining browsers.
I changed mine. I love that librewolf is a thing but I wanted some of the convenience that Firefox has over it
As someone who considered switching to LibreWolf, what are some examples of conveniences found on Firefox that are not available on LibreWolf? I'm mainly sticking to Firefox since I want to sync my bookmarks between devices.
Librewolf is able to do that by turning sync on in the librewolf settings.
Oh thank, you maybe I'll finally use it for a while.
Firefox is my password manager. Also syncing bookmarks and passwords between devices.