this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
232 points (100.0% liked)

News

30926 readers
2686 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal court judge in Ohio denied Friday an attempt by the US Chamber of Commerce to immediately stop the Biden administration’s implementation of Medicare’s new drug price negotiation program.

The ruling was the first time a federal court has weighed in on the multiple lawsuits filed against the controversial program.

The chamber filed a lawsuit in June arguing that allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices is unconstitutional for several reasons. It then asked for a preliminary injunction to halt the program by October 1, when drug makers have to agree to participate in the program.

“As to Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, they have demonstrated neither a strong likelihood of success nor irreparable harm,” wrote Judge Michael Newman of the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, in Dayton.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Candian government has done this for years. Drug prices in Canada are often a fraction of what they cost in the US.

The drug companies swore that they would stop selling drugs in Canada if they weren't allowed to set prices in Canada as high at possible buy they're so fucking greedy that they will take $5 of profit instead of $1,000 and instead of withdrawing from the market and making $0.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

you mean, theyre forced to accept profit margins that arent stupid?! amazing!

and god forbid some life-requiring things be made and sold at cost... someones gotta get their Extra

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

Yes, and they aren't allowed to raise the price of a drug unless they can show a proportionate increase in the benefit to the patient.

[–] just_ducky_in_NH@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

|Among the arguments are that the program violates the Fifth Amendment’s “takings” clause because it allows Medicare to obtain manufacturers’ patented drugs, which are private property, without paying fair market value under the threat of serious penalties.|

This is an invalid argument, because currently the companies are receiving unfairly inflated market value, and Medicare plans to negotiate down to a fair level.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

unfairly inflated

Not according to the poor drug companies. According to them the prices are far too low.

[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I wonder what their argument is for being able to go to other countries and sell drugs three to four times less than in the states.

[–] MiikCheque@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices is unconstitutional** for several reasons. It then asked for a preliminary injunction to halt the program by October 1

wtf kinda colonialism bullshit is this. Negotiating price points is unconstitutional?

confused Boston Tea Party noise

Can't believe this is even serious. Though fitting given how our country's healthcare is the antithesis, a complete joke.