this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
203 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
5130 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Desalination system could produce freshwater that is cheaper than tap water::A new solar desalination system takes in saltwater and heats it with natural sunlight. The system flushes out accumulated salt, so replacement parts aren’t needed often, meaning the system could potentially produce drinking water that is cheaper than tap water.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We get one of these reports every few years, and I'll believe it when I see it. The problem with desalination is it just creates yet another ecological disaster scenario. The waste byproducts are toxic, and as Israel has already proven multiple times, prone to cause issues with the balance of ecosystems surrounding intake ports.

[–] Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Desalination won't touch a percentage of a percentage of a percentage of the brine produced by the sun simply by evaporation.

Our problem isn't the byproduct, it's how to return it to the sea in a distributed way rather than out a single pipe. That's an engineering problem, not an ethical or environmental one.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dress it up or call it whatever you want, but there have been horrible problems with it in the past, and nothing has been done to prevent them happening in the future. A problem is a problem regardless of what type of problem you want to categorize it is.

Let me put it in a way you might understand:

  • Ethical problem - Potentially no correct solution, tradeoffs likely.

  • Engineering problem - Smart people do maths until problem is solved.

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

We care but guess who doesn’t? Corporate Amer$ca

[–] SickPanda@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Which byproducts, Isn't salt water just water + salt?

Or do you refer to the machine?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You can Google this, but the specifics might be hard to get at without specific terminology. Apologies if this is long.

Salt water is not just salt and water. It's a lot of dissolved things at a low concentration, so when you purify it, you can remove the water, but are left with everything else to deal with.

The byproduct is called "brine", and it's basically a highly saline slush with all the heavy metals and now microplastics that humans have fucked the oceans with.

You can't even really turn it into anything else in most cases (locations vary on purity) because after you remove all the water you have things like mercury, lithium, chlorine...whatever other minerals the locale has leeched into the water by natural process or dumping. Due to the processing it's all HOT and volatile, so you cant just let it sit there, you have to put it some place.

You can't just dump it back into the ocean because then you're making the ocean TOO salty and killing everything. You can't put it into a landfill because then you're just building a toxic waste dump. You have to essentially do what we do with nuclear waste and bury it in a vault because there is no good use for it (maybe this can change in the future), and the chances it will just leech out into the world and create an ecological disaster is insanely high.

For every gallon of ocean water you desalinate, you have something like an ounce of this leftover brine. Do that a few million gallons a day, and you have quite a lot to deal with.

This isn't even taking into account all the methane producing living things you're killing by filtering out before you even get to the actual desalination steps, which is a whole other thing.

Tldr: it's not a good way to get water.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

The verdict on brine impact is not out yet AFAIK. It impact species differently.

The good news is that they found no significant changes in the organisms living on the seafloor and other biological indicators. The researchers attributed this to the long history of industrial activities in the area, including cooling water discharge from a power plant adjacent to the desalination plant, which had already perturbed the natural setting.

Study of brine discharge from desalination plant finds good news and bad news (2019)

They are developing technologies to deal with brine like solar powered brine crystallization or mixing it with sea water before reintroducing it. More are discussed quickly in this review: Characteristics of Desalination Brine and Its Impacts on Marine Chemistry and Health, With Emphasis on the Persian/Arabian Gulf: A Review. That one is actually good and very readable to the layman (i.e me):

The conclusion puts it well

The physicochemical qualities of desalination brine are influenced by a number of factors, including the quality of the input water, desalination processes, and discharge methods. These features determine how it affects the chemistry and health of the ocean. The tolerance of marine species to the impacts of salt varies. Several brine management solutions have been developed lately, with increasing water recovery to eventually achieve zero-liquid discharge being the most promising strategy for reducing the harmful impact on marine health.

[–] pneumaticFax@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Much better explanation than my off the cuff attempt, great added detail.

I only saw yours after mine, but very succinct.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe most places pump in extra seawater to heavily dilute the brine, then release the extra-salty water over a wide area back onto the sea.

Yes, and that's the lazy way of getting rid of it, and is ecologically devastating to the ocean. Israel has cause MASSIVE die offs by doing this with their large scale Desal operations, and plenty of info discussing it is online.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The jury is not still out on this. You're posting what is essentially paid advertising for the industry.

Put it like this: You can't take water out of the ocean and expect everything to work as it has been, and you also can't just dump salt into it and expect the same. It's pretty fucking obvious.

[–] pneumaticFax@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Salt brine is highly corrosive to anything in contact with it so it is difficult to move, and in high concentrations wreaks absolute havoc in surrounding ecosystems. There’s a reason the phrase ‘salting the earth’ doesn’t have a good connotation. Desalination on a small scale might not seem like an issue but when dealing with the waste at scale becomes a bigger issue than even the energy cost to perform.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This. I'm curious too, IIRC the byproduct of reverse osmosis is just salt.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

The byproduct is a sort of like salt water, but a lot more concentrated. It’s mostly NaCl, but there’s also various other anions and cations such as Al, Ca, Mg, K, SO4 etc. Those metals came from the ocean, so you might be inclined to think that you can dump them back into the ocean. The problem comes when you dump a lot of that stuff and you get very high concentrations locally. When the concentration of those compounds is within the normal range, sea life can handle it. Once it’s above the limit, you can expect things to struggle or die. Eventually, it will get diluted in the ocean, but before that the concentrations will be high enough to cause damage to most living things.

[–] StopSpazzing@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Don't tell Nestle this, they would store all the ocean water and resell it at a premium.

[–] corship@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nothing about this is "new".

Evaporating water and catching it has been the way to produce fresh water since, like ever. But it's slow, and prone to bacteria.

[–] Perroboc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The “new” is the way they’re doing it

[–] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apparently they solved the issue of how to keep the waste salt from clogging up the system.

[–] corship@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

No they didn't. It's never been an issue. Just don't evaporate all water and use a new batch of salt water before the previous one gets saturated. Availability of salt water usually isn't the issue.

[–] gnygnygny@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The question with desalination is always the same what will you do with the salt ?

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

If it was just salt it wouldn’t be a problem. Salt is an essential nutrient and industrial product and we actually run seawater evaporators today specifically to farm the salt. We mine salt out of mountains and ship it around the world. Salt is our friend.

The actual question is what to do with the concentrated salty sludge by products.

[–] Godnroc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Second moon

[–] WuTang@lemmy.ninja 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about stopping shitting in fresh water ?

[–] Gsus4@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I tested a dry system with sand, sawdust and straw, but none of the other users was a fan :(

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I imagine actually applying your solution would cause quite some friction.

[–] Gsus4@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ofcourse. But that is because the seashells are the obviously superior method. The friction is with the sand and sawdust method.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Evaporating water and condensing it has been done. We don't use this method for desalination since it is more energy intensive (read expensive) than reverse osmosis, which itself is also quite energy intensive.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their solution uses the sun, so..

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

To produce systems energy would be needed too, and all "green" solutions have terrible EROI sometimes even negative, so... this solution have economically better alternatives that already in use