this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
1043 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

61300 readers
3239 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cypher_greyhat@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

If they handle their nuclear reactor like they handle their cloud infrastructure security, we’re doomed.

[–] Nobsi@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago (35 children)

Just fill the Country with Solar, Wind and Water... won't take 10 years and will be cheaper too.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Hydropower is about as bad for most ecosystems as burning fossil fuels. And its definitely not something that can be done quick or cheaply.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I don't get why a train AI would need so much power, how hard is it to drive a train?

Will the nuclear reactors be on the train with the AI, or will it be some sort of wired transfer?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

AI needs that's much power?

Fuck you, ditch it like a Zune and make some more video games.

[–] query@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m not opposed to new nuclear energy in principle. However Microsoft, an unrelentingly bad organization that consistently acts in bad faith to its customers, employees and businesses parters, and is seemingly dedicated to making awful products that never meaningfully improve, is not something I would trust to do nuclear safely.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] query@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

AI's going to kill us off by doing what we do better than us. Consuming resources and producing waste. And we're already pretty good at it.

[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Microsoft has invested in several fusion projects too.

[–] Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

I guess the nuclear power people are gonna become Microsoft fans... powered by nuclear power.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Small Modular Reactor technology is the future, and it's really promising.

Self-contained (no onsite refueling), mass produced (cheap, higher quality), and modular (add more for more power, or small enough to power a data center).

Here's some quick videos from a professor of Nuclear Energy covering topic:

Small Modular Tractors:

https://youtu.be/TYnqJ4VnRM8?si=qODxzqzOCoiNMinH

Micro-Modular Rectors:

https://youtu.be/7gtog_gOaGQ?si=VFeqPcb_DGq8ANCl

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Yesssss

I don't give a shit about training AI but the idea of Microsoft running nuclear reactors is hilarious to me. Either they do it well and we all benefit from the knowledge, or Windows goes out with a bang

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›