this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
158 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

60056 readers
4289 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] db2@lemmy.world 32 points 23 hours ago

Wayland is better anyway.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 15 points 1 day ago

Who is stupid enough to be paying for that shit? Or is this premium+ what bot accounts need to reach the masses like elon's shit takes?

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What the fuck is a "premium" X?

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

Premium X is sparkling diarrhea, only produced by the finest assholes on the internet.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How about I pay zero dollars to continue never using that shithole.

Not asking, fuck you Elon.

[–] RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"What do you have to say to your advertisers?"

'go fuck yourselves'

'also we're raising prices for an unrelated reason'

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 34 points 1 day ago

"There's kind of a lot of people leaving X lately. How do you intend to reinvigorate the user base?"

'this calls for a price increase'

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I feel like the people who pay for Twitter are probably dumb enough to pay whatever price the muskrat wants, so why not make it $200 a month?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

Then there's me.

"Twitter had a premium service??? What the hell would it even do??? I thought they abandoned the blue check mark thing."

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

so why not make it $200 a month?

Why not make it $200 a week?

[–] 3aqn5k6ryk@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Kek. “adjusting” the prices to support the experience it offers. What experiences you dumbfuck.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All that free speech ain't free, you know.

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 0 points 1 day ago

It is if you don't buy premium.

The non-bot accounts are leaving the platform, what should we do?

Quick, milk the rubes!

[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

They should jack it up by 100%

[–] Zier@fedia.io 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So if you add 10 million more bots @ $22/a month that's a lot of money laundering.

[–] 46_and_2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This seems like the most likely intended consequence to me. They probably know their userbase well, and actual humans declining aren't gonna be swayed to stay by a price hike. Those bots, on the other hand...

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 6 points 1 day ago

It doesn’t have to be competitive any more than the room rates at the Trump Hotel in DC.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

Those bots are not going to be happy

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. Elon wants more money
  2. Elon wants X to be profitable now
  3. He wants to destroy X so Bluesky can take the throne
  4. He wants Truth Socia to be profitable
[–] TacoSocks@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago

It's #1, always #1.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's premium prices.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago

Oh Elon, are you planning on doing the TikTok treatment on Bluesky next?