this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
243 points (98.4% liked)

Linux

48693 readers
1150 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey nerds, I'm getting myself a new personal laptop as a treat, but I very much do not want windows 11 shitting it up. Is there a linux distro with caveman-compatible instructions for installation and use? I want to think about my OS as little as possible while actually using it.

I've got one friend who uses mint, but I've also seen memes dunking on it so who knows. I actually really only know what I've seen from you all shitposting in other communities

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Noble_bacon@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago

This is quite a rabbit hole you are getting yourself into, but to keep it short and relatively simple, you need to figure out something very important beforehand:

  • Do you want a rolling release or a stable distro?

I'm assuming that, you are not yet familiar with these terms, so let's go with the stable distros.

You have a lot of options here, most of them will all be based of Ubuntu, which is based in Debian, so let me drop a few generally good suggestions in no particular order:

  • Linux Mint
  • MX Linux
  • ZorinOS
  • PopOS
  • Fedora, (This one is not a stable distro, but you should be good with it)

Either of these is a good starting point. If down the road you feel like they stop fitting your needs, start exploring the big three, (Debian, Fedora and Arch Linux).

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 hours ago

Linux Mint is one of the most common gateway drug for getting into linux.

It's incredibly easy to set up and use. And it has plenty of resources if you ran into any issue.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Don't want to think about your OS? Install Aurora. The hardest decision will be choosing your password. Install instructions are identical to any other Fedora installation. Auto updates to everything, never breaking system with bleeding edge software all the time. Superb documentation, zero maintenance, windows like desktop experience but better. That's all.

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Voltage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Fedora's KDE spin

I really hope more beginner distros switch to kde from GNOME. When I was first getting into linux and did not know about what a DE was, GNOME put me off from fully switching to linux and themeing it was hell with it not playing nice with qt applications, of course as a newbie i did not know what "qt" or "Gtk" was and did not understand at the time why some applications were not following theme.

while kde default is not pretty it can be anything you want it to look like and its easy to customize and plays nice with gtk applications. GNOME IS very customizable that you might even be able to make it into a usable desktop.

[–] MadBigote@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Came to say Fedora KDE is the way to go now. Stable, reliable, powerful and customizable.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)
  • Mint
  • Kubuntu
  • Fedora KDE Edition
  • OpenSuSE
  • Pop!OS

These are all easy to use desktop distros (or variants). Use them with their respective default desktop environment. Check screenshots first or try them out in a VM or via live USB before installation, to see whether you like the look&feel.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Mint gets dunked on for being slow and HDR variable refresh rate and Wayland is not on the cutting edge. Nobody hates it for being stable though.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 14 hours ago

Its also popular and easier to google issues for.

[–] keefanomics@lemmy.ml 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

to be fair you can always remove gnome-keyring and it will go 20x faster. Found out the hard way. I wasn't aware mint had it.

[–] WammKD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 15 hours ago

Huh; any idea why that, of all things, would slow everything down?

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 9 points 15 hours ago

I use my laptop as a tool - no real idea how it works. If Linux nerds are mechanics then I’m just a taxi driver. Use mint. I do. Zero regrets. Caveman compatible.

[–] dontblink@feddit.it -3 points 7 hours ago

Absolutely Debian stable, the first thing i wanted in Linux was stability, coming from windows you want something that "just works" and I think Debian stable + Gnome is the perfect choice for this!

[–] rodbiren@midwest.social 35 points 1 day ago

I've done dozens of distros and Linux mint is the most familiar, unexciting, and stable one I have found. Ignore the hate. Real Linux fans don't care how you participate in open source, other than being toxic. Consequently, do whatever you want and install whatever seems like it would be something you'd want to use.

Id highly suggest having a separate hard drive for Linux as it can be easy to break dual boot if you don't know what you are doing. Last thing you want to do is panic and decide you need to reinstall Windows.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I just set up Nobara.

Shockingly straightforward.

Entire install process was very simple, with a GUI, then a neat little post install app that gives you another very straightforward GUI for running your first batch of system updates.

... Oh, and I was able to do this on a SteamDeck, without an external mouse or keyboard.

Nobara has a SteamDeck edition now.

The install process has a bit of Deck specific jank, basically i just had to change the screen UI scaling level from 175% to 100%, it defaulted to 175% when booting from the SD card i wrote the ISO to...

And then there's a bit of jank doing initial updates off the 'bare metal' install, because the SteamKeyboard overlay thingy will prompt your admin password for a system access prompt... which will disable most of the SteamDeck inputs for everything other than Steam untill you input your password to allow it to work.

The work around I figured for this is... when that prompt comes up, you push the steam button and hamburger menu button on the physical deck until you get Steam in big picture mode.

Then your controls all work in Steam.

Then you close Steam.

Then your mouse works via trackpad on the desktop, but the X button to bring up the SteamKeyboard does not.

So then you open Steam again.

Now the SteamKeyboard does work, and you can type in your admin pass to the system access prompt.

I had to do this silly process a number of times through the initial set up 0.o

I eventually set Steam to not automatically launch itself, and now that all the updates have gone through, I just have to mouse (trackpad) over to manually open Steam when I am in desktop mode and then give Steam the admin pw for the keyboard to work... just once per desktop session now that its all set up.

Probably I also could have gone back into gaming mode and just bound a button to whatever button combo Nobara/Fedora uses as a shortcut to open the actual Nobara/Fedora virtual keyboard, but I could not figure out what this key combo actually is lol.

But uh if you're just looking for an OS for a standard desktop PC, everything I've outlined in the above spoiler is not gonna be a problem, and you'll likely have a very straightforward install process.

I'm also a fan of Nobara's default UI... kind of a gnomeified KDE?

As well as its default apps, built in DeckyLoader and plugins for the Deck, ProtonPlus for runtime environments, and of course its built in kernel customizations/optimizations for to play vidya gaem.

Oh, and I went with Nobara over the default SteamOS because SteamOS on a Deck is a read only OS by default...

You can install flatpaks, but if you want to actually install new core packages, those will get wiped with a SteamOS update... or you have to use DistroBox... which may also get wiped on an update?

Not sure, but Nobara allowse to use the deck as both a Deck and a more standard desktop linux PC with more customizability... and not having to rely on the AUR, which I find incredibly frustrating.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Nobara is pretty painless. Fedora without having to dink with adding repos and fixing graphics drivers. A pile of built-in tweaks for making gaming work out of the box.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Been meaning to try CachyOS. It's a gamer friendly Arch based distro. Might be worth looking at. Distro doesn't really matter much at all. Desktop environment does. If you want HDR support KDE and GNOME are your only bet.

Edit: Kubuntu would probably be the easiest to use and setup distro that has HDR support.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

When first coming from Windows, starting with Mint is the safest bet for a good transition because things will work pretty much as you expect them to, and there's a very helpful forum if you have any questions. But I always say to try several distros and Desktop Environments to see how you like them. Everyone is different and it's all a matter of preference.

I suggest that once you've got whatever distro you decided on up and running, install a virtual machine software such as Boxes (very simple) or Virtual Box (a little more complicated but with more options). Then just download various distros and make VMs for them to try them out easily. Have fun!

[–] Integrate777@discuss.online 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Go ahead with mint. It's the only distro I know with a fully featured setup wizard that holds your hand through the entire process. I am confident anyone who has used computers can use it.

But honestly, most modern distros are about as difficult as picking up an iOS/android phone for the first time. There are different ways of doing things, but they're still phones and can't be too different anyway. Same with mint, it's just a computer, it isn't all that different.

[–] Kvoth@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

I second mint, back when I had more time to fuck with such things I distro hopped like crazy, mint is easy and it just works

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago

Mint is one of the best bets for beginners, it's very similar to windows 10 UI wise by default and generally very user friendly

[–] punchmesan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

You got a lot of distro recommendations from across the spectrum and it's honestly hats to go wrong with any of them. It's mostly a matter of preference. As such I'll give you two pieces of advice:

  1. Set up a multi-boot flash drive (assuming you're currently using Windows, YUMI is a great utility) so that your can try a bunch of them and see what jives with you most. A great feature of Linux installers of that you can actually run the entire OS, full-featured, from the ISO. So grab a whole slew of them, throw them on the flash drive, and spend some time taking them for a spin.
  2. Do your research on compatibility. Laptop makers often don't make Linux drivers, so the latest hardware has compatibility problems until the community covers the gap. There are also some laptop manufacturers that have Linux in mind when they make their products, like System 76 and Framework.

Good luck! IMO getting into Linux for the first time is a fun journey. Enjoy it!

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've got one friend who uses mint, but I've also seen memes dunking on it so who knows. I actually really only know what I've seen from you all shitposting in other communities

Every distro gets shit on in memes, because each distro does things its own way that some don't agree with. As a new user, most of that doesn't matter much, the biggest changes between distros are how stuff works in the background. What matters more is your choice of Desktop Environment (DE). Essentially "the coat of paint on top". Most distros offer a couple different options when downloading the ISO, or when installing it.

I'd reccomend starting out by trying GNOME and KDE Plasma (if they're easily available for your distro), with GNOME being slightly more macOS-like, and KDE being somewhat similar in feel to Windows. Those are "the big two" DEs, but there's plenty of other options available if you don't like them.

As for distros, whatever works for you is the option you should go with. There's only two distros I recommend against using, Ubuntu (/ close derivatives) and Manjaro. Ubuntu is becoming extremely corporate, going against the "spirit" of a Linux distro. There's "Ubuntu Pro", a subscription for security updates, and "snap", an "alternative to" flatpak that forces you on Ubuntu managed repositories, along with many other issues. Manjaro is often marketed as "an easy Arch-based distro", but is in fact only very loosely derived from Arch. This combined with Manjaro team's inability to maintain the distro properly, causes nothing but issues.

As for every other distro, if it's being updated, and it works for you, then it's a great option. Because that second one is very personal, there is no "single best Linux distro". I would personally suggest to check out Mint and Fedora, those are often great options.

As someone else mentioned, with a "new laptop", hardware compatibility may be an issue. Most distros allow you to try them off the USB before installing, that's probably a good idea.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

I found the main issue with many non-rolling release distributions are the upgrade instructions from one stable release to the next, and not the difficulty of installing them.

I'm myself a Archlinux guy, but that does sometimes require some carefulness and regularly (at least weekly) applying updates and does not have stable automatic updates, so I started installing Fedora atomic desktop distributions (Fedora Silverblue/Kinolite/etc.) for people that just want to use their device for basic stuff.

The reason for that is long term maintainability without an expert at hand.

I had so many bad experiences updating distributions from one stable version to the next, be it Debian and Ubuntu-based, or Fedora-based distributions.

And with those atomic desktop distributions the amount of moving parts is much lower, so hopefully upgrading them to newer releases is much more stable.

So I would suggest giving Fedora Silverblue (Gnome desktop), Kinolite (KDE) or Budgie Edition a try.

[–] syaochan@feddit.it 20 points 1 day ago

Go with Mint, it's my daily drive on both my laptop and HTPC. If you choose the regular edition Ubuntu based you have also hardware enablement (hwe) kernels which could be useful on newer hardware.

[–] merci3@lemmy.world 101 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mint is the best distro for the average user who doesnt want to tinker with their OS or doesnt want to waste time fixing issues.

IF Mint doesnt go well with your laptop, I would try out Fedora, which is more up to date with stuff and also very user friendly choose Fedora Workstation if you're feeling adventurous. choose Fedora KDE if you want a Windows like experience.

[–] Blubber28@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To add, if OP is looking to use the laptop for gaming, I can recommend Bazzite. Built upon fedora with some quality of life things and very stable as it's immutable. Very hard to fuck up.

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not sure about recommending immutable distros to noobs, I've read enough reports from people that want to (or because of some hardware crap, need to) install or mess with some low-level stuff that just won't work on the immutable distros, plus a bunch of online advice or help will just not be applicable.

[–] Blubber28@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

It certainly has downsides in that regard, I will not deny that. However, if you want something that Just Works™, it is a very good option in my (admittedly limited) experience.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Universal Blue OSs (Bazzite, Bluefin, and Aurora) are actually way easier than immutable is made out to be.

For one thing, there is no such thing as keeping the system and packages up to date. That all happens automatically as long as you restart your computer every now and then.

It is true that if someone is looking up how to install something online it could be confusing. But anything in Flathub is obviously dead simple.

I think if there were better demos and tutorials, it would seem a lot easier.

For instance, if you can't find something in Flathub, and the only instructions you can find are for installing in Ubuntu, all you have to do is use Boxbuddy/Distrobox and use an Ubuntu container and install it there using the instructions.

It really is the best of almost all worlds. Granted, this setup doesn't work for 100% of software. But it works for the vast majority.

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Listen to yourself. What's a distrobox? Boxbuddy? I'm already annoyed about someone expecting me to learn about this and I've used Linux exclusively for 25 years. I actually did Linux from Scratch and used that for 6 months for actual stuff. Telling a noob who wants to do normal things that work on a normal Linux distros that because of the (recommended by you) immutable distro they have, they need a container which has an actual normal linux distro inside it to run the thing they want to run, they'll want to run away and probably never speak to you again.

And about flatpak: I had so many bugs that somehow only happen when you get the flatpak. And you can't install command line tools over flatpak, you can't install servers or drivers. Regular users (especially windows power user types) are likely to run into these things and curse you for recommending the one distro where you can't just apt install theclitoolineed.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago

And you sound like the entrenched Windows user who doesn't realize all of the little things they've internalized to keep their system working the way they want to. I should know, I was one of those Windows users until recently.

Regarding other tools, they really aren't necessary for most users. I don't even use Distrobox. Flathub for UI apps, and Homebrew for CLI apps serves all of my needs.

I believe that Jorge Castro is right about the Linux desktop. It has failed, and it needs to be rebuilt from the ground up. And that's what they're doing. Universal Blue is a completely different mindset from traditional distros, and I think it's the future.

And that's the great thing about Linux. You can continue to use the old methods you're used to and have built up 25 years of muscle memory around.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

ITT: 100 people naming their favourite distro and making that fit whatever OP needs.

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 1 day ago

So far, people are being pretty reasonable. Most are recommending mint, ubuntu or similars, and no one recommended arch to someone with basic linux/computing skills. I have to say I'm impressed. Restored my faith in the community.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›