this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
-13 points (33.3% liked)

Asklemmy

49393 readers
772 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/51558020

Don't be knobs and tag user unless your relationship permits that behaviour.

Bonus points for actually finding the user with the most posts even if an admin test bot account.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] weeeeum@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (4 children)
[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago

Bonesofthemoon must be up there.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

pugjesus has a lot too

[–] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Don't tell him his shallow neoliberalism is flawed under penalty of bot down votes and ban. He's not a healthy person.

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I've spoken to neolibs here and flyingsquid doesn't strike me as one. Also this is not a discussion to air out user.

[–] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

All his conclusions and logical fallacy align with the neoliberal flavor of the day. Why the fuck would you start a discussion, squid, while claiming this isn't the place to discuss? Typical.

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Airing out is different to discussing. It could be viewed as bullying, catty behaviour.

[–] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But, squid, you don't have any friends on the .ml mod team else you'd have already called in a favor.

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i don't see the point you are making. i haven't reported your comment and that can be verified via modlogs, this isn't a space conducive to building relationships so no i probably don't have .ml friends nor do i have any from other instances. airing out users in a post they are not partaking in is a bad look. you do you but understand i will call it out.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think they are not targeting you, but baiting flyingsquid.

[–] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

He always takes the bait. I think it's funny.

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

i can't imagine flyingsquid cares or has even seen this thread, but your probably right.

[–] weeeeum@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I think if you can precisely tell when a user sleeps and wakes by their comments, they are probably not a healthy person

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My thoughts too, guy knocks em out like my Catholic grandmother.

[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

Downvoted by the offended catholics

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you're counting bot accounts, probably Lemmit.Online bot: 4.82M Posts

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Damn thats insane. Any idea what it does?

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Lemmit Bot copies Reddit posts from subreddits and posts them to communities on lemmit.online. Lots of instances promptly banned the instance outright in favor to having natural content on Lemmy rather than interacting with a mirror of Reddit.

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That explains why I can't see its post history.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 months ago

Right, same with my instance. I didn't mean to mention the user, but guess it doesn't matter since we're not federated with that instance. The link for the user I had put was https://lemmit.online/u/bot, I think our clients are rewriting the links to view via our instances, but opening that link in a browser will show all the posts.

[–] fjordbasa@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why are you asking a question that could be researched? You’re literally asking people to do work for you

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Crowd sourcing can be fun, I already had an idea of the biggest human poster but someone pointed to a bot account with 4.5m which is interesting. If there is a simple search feature baked into Lemmy someone may have mentioned that too which would also be interesting.

Different strokes for different folks.

[–] fjordbasa@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Different strokes, sure, but that’s not the point of this community-

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy:Β context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion
[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago

I mean yea the admins could bend rule 3 and remove this post I wouldn't even be annoyed but they certainly would need to bend rule 3. My post is complaint. Open ended, wouldn't personally call this offensive, very loosely this could fit 3 but I read 3 more as "don't ask how to use Lemmy", I've used Lemmy for 3 years and I haven't seen this question asked, an actual topic of discussion could also be used against this but with albeit limited discussion there definitely is discussion.