this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
701 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60354 readers
5522 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Landmark legislation sees the Australian government committed to the novel step of child protection by banning social media for under sixteens.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] portuga@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

The problem is not teens accessing social media, they’re just bored or don’t know any better

The problem is what adults post on those social media.

If anything teens should have social media of their own, where no elder boomers are allowed

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Unenforcible Law.

Gotta require ID verifications and ban all VPNs in order to actually be enforcible.

Surely, the website owners would never sell your information, right? Right?

[–] quoll@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 hours ago

Gotta require ID verifications

that's exactly what they are "evaluating" now along with "biometric (age and voice) estimation".

government, politicians and media are constructing a parallel reality for themselves.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Banning the Three Letter Word is unenforceable too. If you ban Open*** and Wireguard - too bad, China has done that and people developed obfuscation methods. Even if you try to ban talking about them, they won't go extinct. If there's a supply, there's a demand.

[–] ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 23 points 10 hours ago

Australia is the first nation to fail to ban social media for under 16s.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

In further news, millions of teenagers have become experts at vpns and bypassing online restrictions

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 16 points 8 hours ago

Australia fighting the good fight to produce tech savvy youth

[–] transhetwarrior@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (8 children)

So where exactly are kids supposed to go? People will go on about "they should just go outside" but kids have literally had the cops called on them for the crime of walking around their own neighborhood "unsupervised". I've seen calls to ban kids from all sorts of places - planes, theme parks, restaurants, libraries. I've seen these "mosquito" things put up to drive kids away from public places. Kids are spending all their time on social media because they have nowhere else to go.

[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Hang on. Where I'm Australia have cops been called on kids walking around the neighbourhood? The kids around my neighbourhood go around on their bicycles, skateboard and play in the parks. A few of them graffiti and others put up ads to walk dogs for a fee.

That said, this law is dumb. Australia is so hostile to the tech industry.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago

You can message your friends without all the misinformation and self-harm promoting algorithms

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 0 points 2 hours ago

Even excluding everything other than computers, you can still play games, talk to friends, code etc.

[–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago

So where exactly are kids supposed to go? People will go on about “they should just go outside” but kids have literally had the cops called on them for the crime of walking around their own neighborhood “unsupervised”. I’ve seen calls to ban kids from all sorts of places - planes, theme parks, restaurants, libraries. I’ve seen these “mosquito” things put up to drive kids away from public places. Kids are spending all their time on social media because they have nowhere else to go.

Outside. It may take society a bit of time to adjust, just like it took a bit of time before kids not being outside became normal, but it will happen. Kids run around my town all the time unsupervised, nobody is calling the cops, and parents are looking out for each others kids. Just because some places have gone off the deep end doesn't mean everywhere has.

[–] EsmereldaFritzmonster@lemmings.world 14 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I think this perspective (that teens have nothing else in their lives other than social media) is harmful. I don't understand why they're not able to do the same things teens did before social media......

Police being called on harmless teenagers by the same busybodies over and over again kind of sorts itself out after awhile.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

This is the travel range for kids in the UK by generation. Such a map would be far worse in the US or Australia

[–] transhetwarrior@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

They can't do the same things teenagers did before because the world has been growing more and more hostile to teenagers. More places have banned kids. We have these mosquito things making noises to drive teenagers away. It's become more difficult to get around without a car. Parents have become more helicoptery, not letting their kids out of the house. And "sorts itself out"? Here's what happens. Some asshole calls the cops on teenagers just hanging out. The cops, with nothing better to do than harass innocent people, show up and chase them away. Now those teenagers don't feel safe going back there, because they don't wanna get cops coming after them. Or maybe the cops don't stop at chasing the kids off! Maybe they get arrested for "loitering" or some nonsense. Maybe they get accused of dealing drugs because teenagers hanging around is strange and suspicious, and the cops love to frame innocent people. Cops getting called isn't some silly and frivilous thing.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 9 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Have you actually witnessed that entire event pan out?

The police that I personally know, visit the caller and talk to them first to understand the complaint and often (but I agree not always) educate the caller that teenagers are just doing what the caller(s) did at their age... usually, there are no more calls and all groups move on with their lives.

Unfortunately, that doesn't make headlines and it's not emotive enough to discuss.

In my personal experience, the older generations trust the media and just believe / expect the worst will happen. Most parents, younger adults, just don't see the problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EsmereldaFritzmonster@lemmings.world 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Look, I don't live in Australia, but the way you describe it makes it sound like every single person is a cunt and every place is exactly the same, urban or rural.

Tell me the places with these mosquito sounds.

Can they take public transport or their bikes? A group have their parent or other family provide rides?

Parents aren't helicoptery enough of this is the kind of shit teens are up against day in and day out.

Here's what happens when the cops show up to a busy body call. The cops show up, they ask what's going on, they see nothing illegal is happening and leave. Kids continue living their lives. Can't loiter at the park. Don't trespass or loiter in a parking lot or other private property. If they keep calling, the cops start recognizing whose calling and stop questioning the same kids over and over. Cops always give warnings about loitering. If your police are arresting minors for loitering, you got bigger problems. Honestly, isn't it just a ticket?

Whether or not cops are safe depends on many factors, but having the cops know where you're kids are isn't a terrible thing.

cops love to frame innocent people

Get off the internet and crime shows

How dangerous are the police in Australia? How many fatalities? How often?

Edit: advocating for after school programs / funding would be worthwhile. I think your perspective is exaggerated and dismissive, but we could potentially agree on this much.

[–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Social media is harming them in that case.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

I'm old enough to remember I spent my days riding my bike around town, exploring the woods, hanging out at friends' houses, going to the pizza place and hitting baseballs at the school field with my brothers.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

They will create their own places... which might not actually be desirable for the government lol

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 15 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

If only this applied to the parents as well... No more using your children online to make a buck as an influencer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 42 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Oh those poor kids.

I remember when we banned porn for the under 18s and now nobody under 18 can access porn.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

This is my favorite argument against government regulation.

Anything not foolproof definitely isn't worth doing at all.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

How is this a good argument? The law from the post being stupid notwithstanding, by this logic, why bother making any regulations or laws at all if someone, somewhere is gonna break it.

Are you aware of how much of society is held together with the duct tape of social obligation and the honestly system? Yes we have audits, and enforcement, but honestly in a health society, the vast majority is self-imposed.

This is a really poor argument against government regulation, is all I'm saying.

[–] bigschnitz@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Theres a scale of influence, with a big difference between foolproof and entirely unenforceable.

In this case, it's effectively unenforceable, so what's the point in wasting time and effort drafting something that won't actually make any difference?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 15 hours ago (8 children)

Now kids will be forced to hide being a victim of cyber-bullying from their parents. Great work!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 132 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (26 children)

It's still not entirely clear how the Australian government thinks they're actually going to enforce this.

Plenty of web services already require you to state your age to use them and I believe a large majority of users just coincidentally happen to be born on January 1st, 1900 as a result.

If they're expecting these tech companies to be gathering and storing peoples' government ID's, or something, somebody needs to carefully explain to them using small words why this is a monumentally stupid idea. Does something need to be done about social media addiction and the rampant sketchy behavior of the tech giants? Yes, probably. Is a blanket ban ever the actual solution to anything? No, very rarely.

It's just apparently all anyone can come up with when they've got government-brain.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

It boggles the mind how many times a higher up comes up with some idea (in any context, not just politicians), and never stops to answer the question: "how is this going to work?".

She'll be right mate, don't worry about it 🇦🇺

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 10 points 13 hours ago

I recently switched from 1 January 1900 to 1 January 2000. It feels good to be young again.

[–] shades@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 12 hours ago

It’s still not entirely clear how the Australian government thinks they’re actually going to enforce this.

Since identity verification checks for minors is an absolute nightmare security scenario we are deciding to pull all operations out of Australia.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

All of a sudden their test scores start going through the roof.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

That would be a bad thing. In Australia, you want your test scores to go through the floor.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 4 points 11 hours ago

Attention span >3 minutes would be something already.

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 64 points 23 hours ago (26 children)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›