this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
283 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
3320 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Roblox tells employees they have to come to office three days a week or take severance package::Roblox CEO David Baszucki told remote employees that they'll have to start coming to the office Tuesdays through Thursdays.

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FraidyBear@lemmy.world 161 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Take the severance package. If they are offering a severance package then they are already planning a layoff and are just taking volunteers first. Trust me, this is exactly what happened in tech this year. Take the package or face layoffs / gatting managed out.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Going to hammer hard on this too! Happened to me a few years ago.

This is definitely the goal. And those "loyal" who stay have a dice roll chance to get laid off with nothing later down the line.

[–] FraidyBear@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is exactly what happened to my dad during the .com crash. He worked for Enron, worked in server maintenance. Waited around as everyone got laid off because they said they would keep him, he was the best but not the most senior. Push came to shove and with only 4 people left in the department the higher-ups had to cut one more or take less money. They decided to cut my dad. By then the industry in that city was packed with Enron refugees so my dad had nowhere to go. We lost everything. Seriously y'all, cut your losses it's not worth it. Just find somewhere else that's more stable.

[–] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Read the details first though and compare to what else you can find out. Some companies are sneakily reducing severance package standards just for remote employees. It may be better to just aggressively job hunt while still getting a full paycheck as long as possible.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Could be. But it’s also a wise choice even if they have no layoffs planned.

Let’s say they don’t offer voluntary severance. It’s just RTO or quit. Lots of people will grudgingly RTO while they look for a new job. That makes their time of departure unpredictable and it means they’ll be disgruntled as long as they’re still around. Why not just rip off the band aid, invite these people to leave immediately, and help them do so? You can move on from that.

And maybe by shedding these people, they can actually avoid a layoff.

Paid severance is a tip-off that a layoff may come, but RTO is also a big fucking deal and I could see it possibly having a paid severance component even with no layoffs in sight. Possibly, mind you.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the benefit of VR over IR? I'd have thought the terms would be better with IR, plus you get to be paid a salary for longer

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It depends on the package they are offering.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't you just take the severance package when you get laid off?

[–] SeriousBug@infosec.pub 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Severence pay is not mandatory everywhere. So you might get nothing if you are laid off.

[–] EnglishMobster@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

California it is. WARN act.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

This is a layoff masquerading as "return to office".

[–] RagnarokOnline@reddthat.com 66 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I agree this is probably an attempt at veiled layoffs.

But I wish I could understand why executives are so desperate to have people back in an office. It’s like class warfare or something.

“Don’t let the proletariat spend more time in that box they already overpay for; make them come to the box that WE overpay for!”

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really think it is connected to the fact that many managers never had to think about how long something takes and how much work they actually need out of someone. It used to be, that if you stare at your screen from 9-5 you probably did all the work you could. But now they can't see you stare at the screen and they fear they don't get all the work out of you. For the first time management has to figure out how much work they need instead of going by time spent in the office. That scares them.

[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com 10 points 1 year ago

It's because they all have assets in corporate real estate, have massive amounts of debt that they just refinance latter and get more investors on board so they can ignore the problem. Now we have real pressures that would kill their inflated corporate real estate assets turning that balance sheet upsode down and they are in a panic because they haven't been effectively doing the job they are supposed to. Fuck them

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Extroverts are disproportionately in places of power and authority and CANNOT understand people who don’t like being in the office. So if they don’t want to be in the office it’s because they’re lazy/anti-social/working multiple jobs. These extroverts are convinced that their preferences are the BEST way, because hey, they’re successful and that’s how they became successful.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It’s like class warfare or something.

Marx was right

[–] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

One conspiracy theory I like is that it's a measure against people working at two companies, collecting two salaries.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's really ironic when makers of socially interactive 3D experiences demand their employees meet in physical space. Even more ironic that they tell us that virtual property is valuable.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a long time gamer, playing Roblox with my niece made me feel old for the first time. I have no idea why the hell kids play that game so much outside of the social media aspect with their friends.

It really seems like they are tapping into the addictions of children. I've wasted money on game DLC before, but the amount of crap kids buy on Roblox is insane. I don't think parents really know what they are giving them when they buy gift cards for it. If it makes them happy, okay fine, but I really think it's something psychological that the company is taking advantage of.

Rant over. I agree with everyone else. Something is about to go down. I hope they all take severance and leave. Three days is still better than what I get... which is like 20 WFH days a year... but ultimatums are never a good sign.

[–] LurkNoMore@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My kids play it. 9 and 11. I've played it. I've spent money in it. It's the amount of content. The games are actually really good.

And it's super easy to make something and just send it to the world.

As a developer I used chatgpt and it just spits out whole games.

Edit: Some games are really good. Some games are crap.

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

I’m sure par of the reason for this so they can lay off a bunch of employees.

What’s funny to me is that Roblox and other companies have to threaten peoples jobs to get them to come into the office. Surely if it was as great as they say people would just want to come in x number of days a week.

[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The people in charge at Roblox are evil and have been for a long time.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every time I hear some government tries to destroy privacy "for sake of kids", I think "where have all you been when roblox exploited kids?". When I was a kid and went to municipal children library(most of books are for childern or about children) to ~~play Minecraft~~ do 100% legit research, I've seen some kids play Roblox and hear them talk about them spending insane amount of money. Thank Faust it wasn't me, this is really scary.

[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 2 points 1 year ago

It's not flashy enough for the media to give a shit.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago

I am of the mind that one should always take the package. Clearly, some are working paycheck to paycheck, which sucks.

If you don't take the package, then start applying for other jobs like mad.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 8 points 1 year ago

What's that phrase? 'Shut up or fire me'