DrCake

Nah I don’t think I do actually

The testings fine, it’s the hours that are a real pain in the ass

The US needs more whimsy. “Crossing guard” just sounds way too formal

For humans by humans

Could have fooled me

People here definitely do say shit like that. It's literally the very next comment I read.

I read that as you saw a comment on here that said that?

They’ve done this with a few other games. I remember the EU5 review being really choppy and it turned out they were running it on like 6-7 year old hardware. It might just be a cost cutting measure to not buy the latest stuff for all their reviewers but I basically ignore most of what they say now.

So with the remaining $17m that would be 17,000 e-bike. Say that’s about 1/3 the cost of an e-bike (it’s more like 1/2 but some can get very expensive). For the same level of subsidy you only get 680 cars (average $50k, 1/2 subsidy). Unless it’s still a $1k subsidy in which case what’s the point, who will that persuade who wasn’t already going to buy one? So incredibly wasteful

We can’t just take the robotaxi companies at their word that they are safer though. Countries need some kind of way to test these like human driving tests. Some kind of automated verification system for each update before it can go public.

Otherwise who’s to say Tesla, for example, won’t release a buggy update that becomes worse? They are already releasing versions that allow the car to exceed the speed limit by x amount so to me that would be an instant fail on a test.

I’d buy a private island so that I never had to wipe again, but each to their own…

So they invest in LNG and then threaten supposed “allies” to protect that investment. You know instead of investing in renewables or anything

Maybe some companies are taking a hit to profits? At least for a period, maybe slowly increase prices

She didn’t even “come out of nowhere” looks like the driver should have seen her crossing with enough time. That’s assuming he even looked up from his phone