this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
117 points (98.3% liked)

News

22896 readers
4188 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The two countries, which flank Israel on opposite sides and share borders with Gaza and the occupied West Bank, respectively, have replied with a staunch refusal. Jordan already has a large Palestinian population.

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi made his toughest remarks yet on Wednesday, saying the current war was not just aimed at fighting Hamas, which rules the Gaza Strip, “but also an attempt to push the civilian inhabitants to ... migrate to Egypt.” He warned this could wreck peace in the region.

Jordan’s King Abdullah II gave a similar message a day earlier, saying, “No refugees in Jordan, no refugees in Egypt.”

Their refusal is rooted in fear that Israel wants to force a permanent expulsion of Palestinians into their countries and nullify Palestinian demands for statehood. El-Sissi also said a mass exodus would risk bringing militants into Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, from where they might launch attacks on Israel, endangering the two countries’ 40-year-old peace treaty.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NoiseColor@startrek.website 46 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Tldr: Nobody wants them, because they fear they will bring hamas with them and because they are a political tool against Israel.

Its seriously f*d up.

[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

A friend from Lebanon basically explained to me the exact same thing, it's not that they don't want Palestinians, it's that they know Hamas will 100% enter Lebanon as refugees, and add to that the centuries old conflict between Shia and Sunni Muslims (Hezbollah is Shia while Hamas is Sunni) and you have your answer.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thought Hamas was shia too since they work with Iran so much

[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that's a bit counterintuitive but perfectly makes sense when you remember that Hamas originated from the Muslim Brotherhood, which is Sunni.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well why are they working with Iran then? I though Muslim Brotherhood types tended to align with the Erdogan wing of Turkey's politics given that they're trying to replicate that muslim reaganism kind of vibe.

[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well why are they working with Iran then?

A case of "the enemy of my enemy is also my friend". That they're too different ideologically doesn't mean they can't work together when they're not on the same soil.

[–] r_wraith@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

True, but also maybe they remember the Black September?

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is from the article, so nowhere near your tl:dr

After fighting stopped in the 1948 war, Israel refused to allow refugees to return to their homes. Since then, Israel has rejected Palestinian demands for a return of refugees as part of a peace deal, arguing that it would threaten the country’s Jewish majority.

[–] NoiseColor@startrek.website 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes it's a terrible tldr if you get into nit and grit of it. :)

I can say that Palestinians are being used by islamist groups since the beginning of time and those groups care more for the destruction of Israel than anything else, including having a country named palestina.

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's fair. Kind of the same way as Afghanis and Iraqis have been used by Western nations to overthrow gov'ts that don't want to make oil deals with said Western nations.

It's a game that costs innocent lives, no matter who the players are.

[–] NoiseColor@startrek.website -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Only that one is exploitation for practical reasons, one is religious. The first can be negotiated, the second cannot.

This conflict cannot be solved by the west, Israel, or anyone else, but the Palestinians and for many decades they were pushed by hamas and Israel together to not go into direction of peace.

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] NoiseColor@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago

Maybe not the correct word for the situation, but I'm sure the meaning is there.

[–] Treczoks@lemm.ee 34 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Their refusal is rooted in fear that Israel wants to force a permanent expulsion of Palestinians into their countries and nullify Palestinian demands for statehood.

Aaand... They are right.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They're being very self-serving. They're essentially cooperating with Israel to hold Palestinians hostage while claiming they're looking out for the long-term interests of the hostages. They just don't want refugees or the terrorists who would come with them, and they're trying to dress it up as more than that.

[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well, Hamas continuing the fight from the other side of the Egyptian border, which would be expected, would just draw Egypt into the fight

Accepting the refugees is tantamount to advertising your land the new battleground, cuz Israel totes wouldn't lob missiles at refugees amirite?

Israel's already genocided a dozen times more casualties than they took, they need to chill the fuck out.

[–] MoistCircuits0698@lemm.ee 29 points 11 months ago

"Their refusal is rooted in fear that Israel wants to force a permanent expulsion of Palestinians into their countries and nullify Palestinian demands for statehood"

This line in the article is important to remember.

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

I struggle to think of too many times any country has welcomed all refugees with open arms. Any refugees, from any conflict, fleeing to anywhere.

We should stop making refugees and forcibly displacing people, everyone loses. We already have 108 million forcibly displaced peoples, and 40% are kids globally.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's gonna get much, much worse thanks to climate change.

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

For sure. Which is why we need to figure it out now before we use up what resources we have left on making and shipping yet more bombs and tanks. I can't even begin to imagine the carbon footprint of that.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

Despite what the white folks have tried, America has typically been incredibly welcoming to refugees and diasporites.

It's actually one of the biggest chips on Israel's shoulder, because while America was never perfect for jews, it was better enough than everywhere else that jews who made it here outright rejected the notion that jews cannot be "safe" without a "homeland."

[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean, sure, but that's a lot easier said than done

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

So are most complex problems or worthwhile efforts. I'd love a simple working solution just for once too, but no, situations got to be all contextual and nuanced and shit.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

For Jordan there's the added paranoia that Palestinian refugees were the source point of one of their kings getting assassinated after he began making moves to recognize Israel

[–] neptune@dmv.social 5 points 11 months ago

Did everyone forget the 8 million refugees the Iraq and Afghanistan war created?

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago

Because they're hateful shitheads.