this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
605 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
3000 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

FCC moves ahead with Title II net neutrality rules in 3-2 party-line vote::FCC issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking over Republican objections.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 135 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Good news. But let's not forget with this one in particular, this battle will probably not end in our lifetimes. We let down our guard, and support for net neutrality starts to waver, it'll get attacked again. Maybe in a different way.

This one takes a lot of vigilance and determination to keep. It won't stay permanently "won" any time soon, despite the breadth of the coalition of sorts that supports it. There's just too much money that could be made on the other side, creates a lot of pressure.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 76 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It will only last until the next Republican administration. Elections have consequences. Vote.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

If another Republican administration happens, it will be the last you ever see, because they will seize power as the fascist they are. So yes, never stop voting. We simply can't allow it to happen anymore.

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 27 points 1 year ago

Always assume nothing in politics and law is "permanent". You never know when you're gonna get backstabbed, even if you like the people in power.

[–] BarterClub@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Needs to be a law much harder that way.

And even then... roe v wade

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

let's zoom out a bit: this thing where every incoming administration changes the rules that the prior administration established is probably worse than either of the rules being permanent. Don't get me wrong, please. This is, as Richard Lewis put in in Robin Hood: Men In Tights, "a good change". But it seems like the rules are constantly changing and that can't be good for people who are actually making a good faith effort to follow them. Doubly so because this article says that ISPs are going to sue to stop this rule change, and that while courts of the past have ruled that the rules say that this rule can be a rule they might rule that this rule cannot, by the rules, be a rule, overturning their previous ruling on the rules surrounding the rules.

But don't worry, if republicans ever win again they'll just make "republicans win" the rule. That will make things very simple.

[–] gothicdecadence@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not only is it one party reverting the changes the other made, but it's almost always along party lines. Drives me crazy as no real change will happen so long as Dem are playing defense forever

[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That... Is the point of conservatism right? No progress.

[–] gothicdecadence@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

True, but until there's more than two parties or the Deme start being more aggressive the regressive party will always win long term

this thing where every incoming administration changes the rules that the prior administration established is probably worse than either of the rules being permanent.

I mean... Republicans' rule is objectively bad. Confusion over the rule is not good, but also prevents the bad rule. Maybe I'm weird, but "not bad" seems better than "bad," right?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 14 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Federal Communications Commission today voted to move ahead with a plan that would restore net neutrality rules and common-carrier regulation of Internet service providers.

In a 3-2 party-line vote, the FCC approved Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which seeks public comment on the broadband regulation plan.

The proposal would reclassify broadband as a telecommunications service, a designation that allows the FCC to regulate ISPs under the common-carrier provisions in Title II of the Communications Act.

The plan is essentially the same as what the FCC did in 2015 when it used Title II to prohibit fixed and mobile Internet providers from blocking or throttling traffic or giving priority to Web services in exchange for payment.

The Obama-era net neutrality rules were eliminated during Trump's presidency when then-Chairman Ajit Pai led a repeal that reclassified broadband as an information service, returning it to the less strict regulatory regime of Title I.

Title II regulation isn't just about net neutrality, Rosenworcel said, arguing that the reclassification will give the FCC more authority to protect national security on broadband networks.


The original article contains 501 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] 7112@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Yay

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.