this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)

Science Fiction

13617 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

  1. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
  2. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
  4. Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
  5. Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I got this book because it seemed like a cool edition of The Foundation Trilogy. I later discovered that it glows in the dark when I turned the lights off to go to sleep.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] norbert@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Foundation trilogy is absolute peak science fiction and I should definitely re-read it.

[–] Porcupirate@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I totally agree. This series, along with the original Dune novels, is the bedrock of my love for sci-fi.

[–] nikt@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I couldn’t disagree more. The writing is absolute cringe.

For some reason I assumed Asimov would be a good writer, maybe because I read his “Last Question” short story a long time ago and thought it was brilliant.

But Foundation reads like it was written by a teenager. He’s obsessed with describing ghee whiz gadgets and doodads that I couldn’t care less about, the prose is plain and boring, and the themes and characters have not aged well. It feels like I’m watching the Jetsons, except it’s not at all quaint.

I was hoping to be able to look past all this and get lost in the epic scale of the story and universe he purportedly builds, but it just wasn’t there for me.

[–] alan_r_paine@mstdn.social 1 points 9 months ago

@nikt @norbert@kbin.social I agree Foundation and its associates are not very well written. But the sequel Foundation's Edge (1982) is brilliant. He's a whole different writer. From the same period there are The Robots of Dawn (1983) and Robots and Empire (1985). I especially like the almost philosophical discussion, in Robots and Empire, between two robots about the meaning of Asimov's great invention, the laws of robotics.

[–] thegiddystitcher@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely expected this to be a weird makeup thread from the title. Don't Lemmy while tired, kids.

[–] erte@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool! That book cover alone is better than the show 😂

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

The show is its own thing. It was always going to need to be radically different to work on the screen. That's what adaptation means.