Technology

Go NY DA! Fuck all these assholes, she's doing what nobody else has the courage to do and we should be very grateful!

children

You mean current and future products/advertising targets?

It's simple. It's so they can get them into that content pipeline early, that way they keep their eyeballs on the ads as long as possible.

Mental health is actual health.

Data collection should be limited by the government, that is not a decision to an avarage parent.

I’m actually all for banning commercials and ads yes thank you. The rise of marketing as an industry has caused more toxicity than any other

"But parenting is hard. I'd rather the government be my kids' parent."

Literally in the article:

One internal study cited 13.5% of teen girls saying Instagram makes thoughts of suicide worse and 17% of teen girls saying it makes eating disorders worse.

You don’t usually have to ask someone if they’re being harmed by a person/substance/thing to see the negative effects it is having on their lives.

Socially media is already known to have negative impacts on adults. This means it WILL also have a negative impact on children and youth. Seeing as children and youth are even more susceptible to negative influences, due to their body and brain still developing, we need to protect them from what we can.

Even if kids are seeing worse things in their every day lives, that doesn’t make it okay to subject them to other less worse things.

Doing something "for the children" is more important, apparently, than doing anything useful.

It's not popular to "defend" social media these days, but plenty of studies have found that an adolescent's online life is basically a reflection of their offline life. i.e. the social media effect is being overstated due to factors largely beyond the platform's control. But if people don't want to hear that from some rando online commenter, maybe they'll listen to real scientists:

The largest independent scientific study ever conducted investigating the spread of Facebook across the globe found no evidence that the social media platform’s worldwide penetration is linked to widespread psychological harm.

https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news-events/news/no-evidence-linking-facebook-adoption-and-negative-well-being-oxford-study/

Within-person changes in self- and other oriented social media behavior were unrelated to within-person changes in symptoms of depression or anxiety two years later, and vice versa.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563223002108?via%3Dihub

Eight-in-ten teens say that what they see on social media makes them feel more connected to what’s going on in their friends’ lives, while 71% say it makes them feel like they have a place where they can show their creative side. And 67% say these platforms make them feel as if they have people who can support them through tough times.

https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/11/16/connection-creativity-and-drama-teen-life-on-social-media-in-2022/

Using social media is not inherently beneficial or harmful to young people. Adolescents’ lives online both reflect and impact their offline lives. In most cases, the effects of social media are dependent on adolescents’ own personal and psychological characteristics and social circumstances—intersecting with the specific content, features, or functions that are afforded within many social media platforms. In other words, the effects of social media likely depend on what teens can do and see online, teens’ preexisting strengths or vulnerabilities, and the contexts in which they grow up.

https://www.apa.org/topics/social-media-internet/health-advisory-adolescent-social-media-use

The most recent and rigorous large-scale preregistered studies report small associations between the amount of daily digital technology usage and adolescents’ well-being that do not offer a way of distinguishing cause from effect and, as estimated, are unlikely to be of clinical or practical significance.

https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcpp.13190

Edit: The excess data collection is a separate issue, and one that really does need to be dealt with.

While I get your point, and I totally agree with it, there are some actual dangers that must be recognized, and they are dangers to which everyone is exposed somehow, but that could probably affect children more. These are the privacy problems (the article is about Meta collecting children data probably without them caring about it) considering that a child could not know how to properly use the internet (again, it is not so obvious given the fact that there are probably more internet illiterates among the boomers and older population in general), and cyberbullism. Younger people could act less consciously, they are young anyway. But that has nothing to do with the dangerous content that our children should never see with their pure and innocent eyes. I mean, explicit and harsh contents on the internet do exist, and while it's probably not desirable to voluntarily expose children to these contents, what disturbs me the most is the puritane posture that the adults take in relation to the Children, as you say. Yes, they are not really understanding the children, nor helping them

You should really watch this, because it's clear you have no idea what you're talking about.

https://youtu.be/7h7anorDy9A?t=205