this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

14 readers
2 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In the past players could sign contracts for 10+ years. What would be the greatest and the most disastrous contracts if that were always allowed?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] referee-superfan@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

You’d see players that go crazy for a season probably take like 6-7 year contracts. The opposite of betting on themselves.

[–] RROORRYY@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I think we might see something like in MLB, Giannis getting 10 years 700m contract

[–] HotspurJr@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

So back when you could make a legal longer contract, teams offered the max.

Generally the guys who were offered the max were the guys one step down from being truly worth it. Someone like David Lee, with his Warriors contract. When he signed it, I mean, okay, maybe he wasn't really worth it, but no-one in their right mind would have said "we want this guy for 7 years at this price."

But deals like Beal's or Westbrook's or Wall's - even if it's a bad idea, not offering the max length was seen as "we don't really mean it."

It was ownership who was arguing for shorter and shorter contracts until recently. They clearly benefitted players.

In an era of rapidly rising cap and player empowerment, there's more incentive for players to take shorter deals, especially at the very top. You can be KD, and even an injury isn't going to stop you from getting a max deal.

[–] boozinf@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Bobby Bonilla baby

[–] BlazeMan1993THC@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

4 year guaranteed contracts are truly the best. Not even 5 years or 6. 4 is the sweet spot for both the organization and the player.