this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
50 points (96.3% liked)

Games

35018 readers
715 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

So...bad frame rates all around? 😓

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh boy, I can't wait for top end PCs to barely be able to run the games that look only slightly better than a PS3 game!

Waiter waiter, more poorly optimized games, please!

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Look, it may not run well, but you need to go back and take another look at PS3 games. If I wanted to say a new game looks like a PS3 game, I'd pick Earth Defense Force, not Monster Hunter (unless you mean Monster Hunter Rise).

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have to question some folks ability to see when they say Wilds looks worse than World or like a PS3 game.

Certainly has some low-res textures that look weirdly out of place but it's not like the entire game looks like this.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Regarding the comparison to World, what I have said in the past is that while Wilds does look better, it doesn't look nearly enough better to justify just how much worse it performs.