this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
243 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37705 readers
99 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] towerful@programming.dev 68 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess this is approaching the "find out" phase.
VW/Audi group fucked around with emission tests, and they found out.

[–] Stillhart@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They found out what? Their business wasn't affected at all as far as I can tell. They should have been broken up and shut down but instead they got caught doing the same thing AGAIN.

So yeah, not sure what Tesla is going to find out other than "money means you can get away with anything", which Musk already knows well.

And just to be clear, I own a Tesla. I just got it back from the shop after ELEVEN MONTHS because those fucking tools would rather sell more cars on false promises than divert some parts to repair the cars they've already sold. I love that car but I'm selling it. Nobody should go anywhere near Tesla cars until they get their supply chain shit together.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did they loan you another car during that time, or were you stuck paying on a car you couldn't use for 11 months? I'd consider suing if it was the latter.

[–] Stillhart@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was absolutely the latter. And I absolutely would sue if I didn't have serious health issues (hello, cancer!) to deal with instead. It takes a lot of time and effort to deal with something like that, and that's just not in the cards right now.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry about your condition. Beat the shit out of it!

[–] Turun@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

A lot of businesses get away with shit, but the emissions scandal did lead to some big fines and criminal investigations into the upper most management level.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Yes, they found out that there's no real drawback to falsifying statements.

[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 62 points 1 year ago

"If you tell our customers we misled them, that would be bad for our business!"

[–] TomMasz@kbin.social 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For a "genius", he sure is slow on the uptake.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He sure is lucky for someone so stupid.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have to wonder if the entire concept of the business savvy billionaire is just a case of survivorship bias. Not for all of them, but a lot.

I mean, if you get the population of the civilized world together and have them start flipping coins, plenty of people are going to get heads 20 times in a row. Or if they’re from a rich family maybe they only have to get 10 heads in a row.

(Used round numbers for illustration. 20 heads in a row is only about 1 in a million, 10 heads is one in a thousand.)

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So much of it is luck, starting from birth onwards.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

Yep. I was going to write that maybe somebody like Warren Buffett would stand out as the real deal who is consistent and could do it again. But even if that’s true and he is 100% unique skill, he STILL got very lucky by birth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

It's more like, it costs a lot of money to get a chance to flip those coins in the first place, so someone who's already rich to begin with will get many more tries.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MayonnaiseArch@beehaw.org 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He warns? Does he now? I know that bashing journalists is a rightwing ting, but these dudes are really complicit in all of this shit. How the hell do you come up with that kind of headline? He warns

[–] TonyaCanning@mstdn.social 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@MayonnaiseArch @Five This is why people argue government officials shouldn't hold individual stocks. He is hoping there are enough people in a position to gut the investigation who own a lot of Tesla stock.

[–] mPony@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

Bingo! If accountability hurts the bottom line, then The Big Money will argue against accountability in any form.

Big Money got a mighty voice.
Big Money make no sound.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 43 points 1 year ago

So, basically... "an investigation into whether we lied to customers in order to sell them stuff would have an impact on our business". Well, yeah, that's true. Shockingly, customers don't like being lied to about the quality of the goods they're buying, and hearing that there's enough indication of lying to warrant a full probe into it would make future customers hesitant to buy. While wrongdoing hasn't been proven yet, I can't imagine this probe would be happening "just in case" Tesla lied - there must have been a high volume of complaints from customers who aren't happy. The precedent set by not investigating would be awful. It'd basically say businesses can claim whatever they like about their products, because being caught lying about them would always have the consequence of "material adverse impact on our business".

[–] b0rlax@beehaw.org 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the truth about your business hurts your business, you don’t have a good business.

[–] UnspecificGravity@lemmings.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Are you seriously suggesting that a company (tesla) that does 50 billion in sales is NOT worth three times the value a company that does 250 billion (toyota)?

The Tesla valuation is such a fucking joke. They are a "bigger" company that Toyota, Honda, or Ford despite not even doing a fraction of their outright sales, and likely making less on every single one of those sales. Their only advantage is that they were making electric cars before it made economic sense to make them. Now that everyone else is jumping in they are going to die on the vine because people can get a real EV that costs half of a Tesla and actually works.

Tesla DID have a chance of leveraging their early market presence by either introducing a higher quality or cheaper vehicle that could compete with their new competitors. Their existing presence could have captured enough of the market to stand against them if they had a product that was in the same league. Instead they made the fucking Cybertruck.

[–] b0rlax@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Right, so it’s a bad company, like I said.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, that’s how consequences work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MegaMichelle@a2mi.social 29 points 1 year ago

@Five

"Well hey, now, let's not get hasty. If you investigate me for crimes, you will find that I committed crimes! That would be bad for mee. Is that really what you want?"

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

then maybe you shouldn't have lied to your customers about your cars

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SariEverna@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago

Yes, that is the point, Tesla.

IE "we lied, but don't tell nobody!"

[–] sim642@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So it has the intended effect.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's how it works, you fucked around and something something

[–] TheTimeKnife@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago

Well yeah buddy, that's why you used fraud to increase profits.

[–] SteveClough@metalhead.club 10 points 1 year ago

@Five Oh good.

What he means is that being found out for lying will impact how much people believe him.

Well no shit Sherlock.

[–] Obdurodon@hachyderm.io 8 points 1 year ago

@Five Fancy way of saying "we can't win without cheating"

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Is that how that works? /s

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

You gave warning a whole new meaning.

[–] tchauhan@mastodon.mit.edu 6 points 1 year ago

@Five Most Si valley businesses are built on exaggerated claims. You don't work your way to wealth. You lie and pillage your way to it.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Looking forward to the mob using that as a legal defense.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

This sounds a lot like a threat.

[–] lin11c@toad.social 5 points 1 year ago

@Five @voron I can’t wait until this vile grifter is in prison.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 5 points 1 year ago

Oh no! Anyway.

[–] NotSpez@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Elon = moron*c^2

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

Tough shit.

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago
[–] H4Heights@mstdn.social 3 points 1 year ago

@Five I see no downside to the Incel’s car business being investigated.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryTesla says it has received requests for information and subpoenas from the US Department of Justice related to potential personal benefits violations, the advertised range of its vehicles and personnel decisions.

The Wall Street Journal in September reported that federal prosecutors are investigating perks provided to Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk going back as far back as 2017, including a project described as a glass house for Musk.

Earlier this year, Reuters reported that Tesla had created a special “diversions team” to avoid dealing with complaints from customers about their vehicle ranges.

The filing warned of “the possibility of a material adverse impact on our business” should the government pursue an enforcement action.

The subpoenas add to a mounting number of government probes into the electric-vehicle maker.

In September, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued Tesla alleging that it has been “tolerating widespread and ongoing racial harassment of its Black employees” at its Fremont, California, plant.


Saved 21% of original text.

load more comments
view more: next ›