this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
72 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

2094 readers
184 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • SpaceX’s eighth Starship launch ended in a “rapid unscheduled disassembly”.
  • The company reportedly lost communication with the rocket before it began tumbling and eventually, blew up.
  • The Super Heavy Rocket returned to Earth safely and was caught by Mechzilla.
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if Elon has driven off a good chunk of his quality SpaceX employees yet?

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Despite what he may say at times. He's not necessary for SpaceX operations. Gwynne Shotwell runs the day to day company, and they aren't public so no need to say anything publicly for headlines like he does with Tesla.

The topic of conversation is how tons of people don’t want to be associated with anything eel-on-musk is doing anymore after he more or less took the mask off, did his “weird hand motion (twice in a row, on national television, one of which was in the direction of orangeboi)”, and then started (and is continuing) to take a chainsaw to silly little government agencies like the CDC, NOAA, CFPB, Social Security Administration, and so on.

Most smart people don’t like dumb and evil people. I would not at all be shocked to learn SpaceX is facing some serious brain drain.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but that is a valid concern nonetheless. One major reason for the early successes of SpaceX and Tesla was their ability to attract top talent. I don't think anyone with any self respect wants to work there these days.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Could say the same about Facebook, and Google. Yet they don't have any issues funding talent.

Money makes the world go round, at least most of the time. And enough of it can make just about everyone shove their principles into a box.

Meta and Google throw money at people as compensation for making them build unethical, immoral stuff.

SpaceX has traditionally paid far less, relying on “we’re building fucking reusable rockets”, which in normal circumstances, to a lot of engineers, is pretty rad, and kind of its own selling point.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Well, privacy invasion and eccentricity is one thing. Overt fascism and staging a coup are on a whole other level.

[–] gil2455526@lemmy.eco.br 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Ah, yes, the SpaceX method of rapid development and iterative design by... testing in production and making debris rain over the Caribbean, disrupting air traffic in the region.

I'm done with fanboys calling this method genius. "Oh, it would make the production lines idle for months". Bullshit. Just make it right. Compare it to the Saturn V, it only needed one test flight to orbit and never had a major failure, and the Saturn V had components welded and drilled by hand, with 60's tech. Oh, and it launched once every two or three months in 1969, just like Starship today.

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 3 points 2 days ago

If SpaceX could do this shit in a way that's more respectful to the environment and other humans then I think it'd make a lot of sense.

A lot of the early US space program used what is basically iteratively design. The military wanted big nukey rocket quick like what for to exploderate the Ruskis, and even NASA was honestly pretty cavalier until the Apollo 1 tragedy.

This doesn't excuse SpaceX for their shit at all. Find a way to do this shit safely or don't do iterative design.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

The Super Heavy Rocket returned to Earth safely and was caught by Mechzilla.

It's so hard to take Musk seriously sometimes.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Put Elon on one

[–] ladydragonfruit@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

"Rapid unscheduled disassembly" is such a mood right now.