this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
29 points (76.4% liked)

Fediverse

32445 readers
1678 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bluesky, which uses it, has been opened to federation now, and the standard basically just looks better than ActivityPub. Has anyone heard about a project to make a Lemmy-style "link aggregator" service on it?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 69 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

ha, no.. bluesky is not open to federation. they control the only router and do not allow connectivity to routers not controlled by them.

there isnt a single non-bluesky controlled instance that can federate natively with bluesky.

bluesky is just twitter with a little more user-controllable data sourcing. not that theres anything wrong with that, but its certainly not a part of any federation.

e. suggested reading: https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I believe the "free our feeds" people are working to change this though.

[–] rglullis 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

And they are either in for one of the following:

  • a $30 Million lesson where they learn that they will have to reinvent ActivityPub in order to be "properly" decentralized
  • a rug pull where they come up with a second relay like Bluesky but fork to give exclusive access for large institutions and the enterprise.
[–] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

It's ridiculous they were asking for $30m to do something that ActivityPub already does. Wasted money that could have gone anywhere else

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

There are important features that ATPro has that activity pub doesn't. I'd prefer activity pub be the winner but they really need to improve some things. Namely, identity. Bluesky identity is more portable.

[–] dpflug@kbin.earth 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Identity was already solved with Zot aka Nomad, which is part of the Fediverse and easier to implement than ATProto.

It's mostly been ignored because it's just not that important to people, apparently.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nomad is very good at what it does.

[–] dpflug@kbin.earth 2 points 3 weeks ago

I just wish Hubzilla wasn't a UX nightmare.

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not implemented in mastodon or lemmy though. I'm not saying it can't be implemented, but it hasn't been in any platform.

[–] dpflug@kbin.earth 2 points 3 weeks ago

No, but the software that implements it also implements ActivityPub, so you can get nomadic identity and also still interact with the rest of the Fediverse.

[–] rglullis 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

We still don't need ATProto for that. ActivityPods solves that.

ActivityPub itself is built around the principle that the server owns your identity: the best you can do is abandon an identity (i.e, your actor URL) and tell everyone else (via the Move Activity) that you are adopting a new identity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

There is also the consideration that ATPro has a community that's both larger and less technical, so it would be harder to move them here than the other way around. I'm thinking the direction to go might be ActivityPub servers that can route things between ATPro personal data stores, but obviously I'm still learning.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

good luck to them. the router piece is incredibly top heavy and not designed for horizontal scaling.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep. What do you think the chances are you could write something that does the job of the router and app view, but in a totally off-standard, more point-to-point way?

In the meanwhile, it's just a matter of bridging, I guess.

the protocol itself creates a barrier to entry preventing other organizations. it puts all the eggs in one basket.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a good blog post, thanks. I made a quick summery elsewhere in the thread.

It's really unfortunate that we've ended up with two populated protocols for federation, both of which have a major flaw. In our case, it's no established support for moving accounts. In theirs, its a component that's so bulky the federatability is questionable (and no federated DMs).

[–] rah@feddit.uk 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

both of which have a major flaw

What major flaw do you believe ActivityPub has?

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They mentioned the flaws of both platforms.

In our case, it's no established support for moving accounts.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks! Does Lemmy display something when people have their cake day so it's easily visible? Mbin (which I use) doesn't, so I wasn't actually aware until I saw your comment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, it doesn't have to be part of the standard (it could just as well be Lemmy-specific), but no built-in way to move accounts sucks. AT protocol provides a nice little solution for that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rah@feddit.uk 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

looks better

What do you mean?

than ActivityPub

ActivityPub is decentralised. AT has a centralised index. They're not comparable.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

I didn't have that one little detail about how demanding a relay is to run. Thankfully, this thread has been illuminating.

It's still a bummer that Lemmy doesn't provide any non-hack way to move your account to a new instance.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

the standard basically just looks better

Place your bets everyone, has OP ever looked at either standard?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Bets all in? Okay:

spoilerI have not looked directly at the AT standard, just the Wikipedia article and some similar high-level explanation.

Pretty sure I have actually looked at the ActivityPub standard at times, though.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

https://threadsky.app/

Very slow at the moment, probably due to people looking for Reddit alternatives but was fine couple of weeks ago when I first saw it. Seemed okay if you’re okay with AT Proto (it’s not that decentralised really).

[–] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There's also this:
https://frontpage.fyi/

Not sure which of the two has been around longer, but looks like frontpage is also pretty slow going.

[–] timconspicuous@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

The main difference between Threadsky and Frontpage is that Threadsky is just yet another Bluesky re-skin, it's just regular Bluesky posts presented in a reddit-like format, whereas Frontpage has its own dedicated lexicon and doesn't ingest the Bluesky firehose at all. I think Frontpage is really neat, but it has been shown little love unfortunately, it hasn't meaningfully changed in months.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Really? In what way?

Digital identities being cryptographic and independent of any one instance is huge all on it's own. The rest of it I understand less clearly, but it looks pretty modular.

[–] gandolfini_the_grey@lemm.ee 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

See here. Basically, creating a relay for the AT protocol is extremely costly and only possible for big tech companies.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Thank you!

TL;DR, the relay bit works as a completely connected network topology, and has the associated quadratic growth issues, which renders it, like you said, hard to host.

Also nasty: Direct messages are just not federated.

Other things are or were at the time of writing janky, but nothing else is quite that egregious. The author is working on a separate project, and recommends this idea as a solution for portable identity on ActivityPub; here's what "object capability" means in the context.

[–] ericjmorey@discuss.online 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

The data is not centralized, but everyone is using the same ~~aggravation~~ aggregation service (indexer) to access the data.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ericjmorey@discuss.online 1 points 3 weeks ago

LOL I should have reread that one.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

Most aggregation services are also aggravation services, so this really makes sense either way.

[–] egerlach@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

There was a good discussion online between Christine Lemmer-Webber, one of the editors of the ActivityPub W3C Standard, and Bryan Newbold, protocol engineer at BlueSky.

These are long reads. But they are worth reading. Christine and Bryan agree that ATProto and ActivityPub have different design goals and so what you get from "federation" with each is different. ATProto makes a centralized index of the entire system possible, at the cost of relying on very few (practically likely one) centralized providers.

As a result, the Lemmy ecosystem, as it exists today, wouldn't be possible with ATProto. It would probably look more like Reddit, but with a "credible exit" possible as a defense against enshittification.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago
[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's very difficult to use. As a dev, it's not the greatest.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh? Complicated, fragile, something else?

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The spec requires a huge relay for everything as well as not the greatest docs/missing pieces.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Bluesky should just turn on ActivityPub at this point

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

Leaving aside all the work they did making an alternative more to their liking, that kind of implies it's like a light switch, and it's not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Oskar@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

If Bluesky becomes federated with multiple instances, it will be just as impossible to enter as ActivityPub-based services apparently are since instance-selection is a blocker.

RIght?

;)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›