this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
54 points (98.2% liked)

Privacy

5386 readers
122 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 30 minutes ago

Maybe we can just ban copyright then?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago

Well, then it is over.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 26 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"Your proposal is acceptable."

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

Ahhh! chomp chomp chomp

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 23 points 15 hours ago

OK. Bye-bye.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Has any reporter responded to his statement with the question,

"So can anyone legally copy and sell OpenAI models and software?"

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 10 hours ago

Isnt that exactly what Deepseek did?

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 13 hours ago

This is so unbelievable dumb, I can't take it. Fuck a woodchipper, you asshole!

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I really hope someone would come around and try to do it the correct and rights-respecting way just to show how full of crap this guy is.

On the other hand, this “AI” garbage needs to calm the hell down so everyone can actually be reasonable about what they’re accomplishing. LLMs are not “AI”. They are a very tiny piece of a very big puzzle that will, eventually, develop into AI.

And the jury is still out on as to whether that is a great idea or the worst idea ever.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

get your creepy little eyes the fuck outta my headlines

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago