this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
63 points (98.5% liked)

Privacy

5413 readers
154 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 14 hours ago

Maybe we can just ban copyright then?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Well, then it is over.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Your proposal is acceptable."

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Ahhh! chomp chomp chomp

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 23 points 1 day ago

OK. Bye-bye.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Has any reporter responded to his statement with the question,

"So can anyone legally copy and sell OpenAI models and software?"

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Isnt that exactly what Deepseek did?

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 day ago

This is so unbelievable dumb, I can't take it. Fuck a woodchipper, you asshole!

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I really hope someone would come around and try to do it the correct and rights-respecting way just to show how full of crap this guy is.

On the other hand, this “AI” garbage needs to calm the hell down so everyone can actually be reasonable about what they’re accomplishing. LLMs are not “AI”. They are a very tiny piece of a very big puzzle that will, eventually, develop into AI.

And the jury is still out on as to whether that is a great idea or the worst idea ever.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

get your creepy little eyes the fuck outta my headlines

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago