this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Soccer (Closing)

157 readers
1 users here now

This community is being retired in favor of !football@soccer.forum.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mundaneinanities@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It seems like the league has a smart and easy out here. It can state that it accepts Onana's interpretation, drop any punishment for Garnacho, and state that it takes the issue of racial abuse seriously, as evidenced by this thorough investigation, so players must be mindful of their social media conduct.

Done. Dusted. They don't punish a guy who doesn't appear to have done anything untoward, and look like they are actually willing to back up their policies.

[–] ThereWillBeGoals@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

It can state that it accepts Onana's interpretation,

They said they accepted Cavani's interpretation as well. They still banned him.

[–] JiveTurkey688@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean if he gets banned for a game he gets banned for a game. Its hardly an actual controversy compared to the other shit we have had going on.

[–] Reach_Reclaimer@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah but he shouldn't be banned for a game because of an innocuous comment that someone can twist to racism

[–] JiveTurkey688@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Sure I obviously agree