this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
177 points (98.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6969 readers
300 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 years ago

Not just this cunt, tory cunts.

[–] federalreverse@feddit.de 41 points 2 years ago (6 children)

And the only rationale is this..?

in the hope of opening up a clear divide over the green agenda with Labour

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 years ago

Either

  • cos they are just trying to burn it down and make a quick quid for their mates
  • it's genuinely a fault in the voting line and they have realised they'll manage to cling on to power

I can't decide which makes me angrier.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He's setting up him and his friends for jobs in banking and oil once he loses to a disastrous (for tories) labour majority in early 2025

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We voted for Brexit. Don't underestimate our ability to vote in these cunts again.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Oh sure, but also I'm just going on what seems to actually be happening. He's losing should-never-lose battles. I'm more worried that farages new fasicist and popularist party will get too much power rather than the tories. Tories are kind of just dead in the water now

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

He's trying to make sure his party will lose by an even greater margin?

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

He knows his party is fucked so he's trying to do favours for his mates in the oil industry while he still can

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Makes me fucking livid. They don't pretend it's for anyone’s good any more: they just nakedly wreck shit for political gain. Pepperidge Farm remembers when these shitters used to try and justify their awfulness.

[–] Rambi@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

It is basically guaranteed that he has lost the next election so he is just frantically throwing everything at the wall to see if anything sticks

[–] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

What a cunt

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm nothing like a royalist or anything, but Charles isn't gonna like that given his involvement in environmental causes.

[–] Rambi@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm pretty sure Charles is the "we need to sterilise the poor so they can't breed because the world is over populated" kind of environmentalist that also supports fox hunting. At least that's the only kind environmentalist British aristocrats tend to be.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago

At this point I consider any of these "policies" to be a form of suicide.

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Prime Minister holds rather a lot more power

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Like what, setting the tea prices?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Prime Minister is something like speaker of the house plus the non-ceremonial parts of being President rolled up in one.

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it's a tiny island nation. Barely the size of a u.s. state. They lost any power they had when they left the eu.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago

It's larger than most US states in terms of area, and bigger than California in terms of population, with a similarly-sized economy. That's big enough to still matter.