this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
32 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

2375 readers
212 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SecondaryAnnetagonist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

these people are so mind-numbingly risk adverse they don't greenlight any new properties and tacitly reheat old ones there will eventually be a whole generation of people who never saw anything new or worthwhile from them

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago

That's just late-capitalism in general. No large companies are innovating anymore. They simply let smaller companies pop up and then either buy it or kill them with legal or market dominance based maneuvers. I mean if all that mattered to you was short term profit, would you take any risks? Easier to destroy than create of that's all you care about.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago

Adapt or die. Hollywood has chosen the latter. They have chosen poorly.

On the bright side, they are in good company with most of America at this time.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 week ago

Well, Hollywood seems to prefer quantity over quality. Now 99% of everything is junk that's not worth wasting your time on.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

Well the newer content is not exactly what I call great. There are good movies and TV shows here and there but most of it is junk.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago

99.99% of American movies and TV is so shit, I wouldn't even pirate it. There is a whole planet full of interesting, intelligent, educational and very well written content. Creativity left the US when the whole nation became a massive greedy corporation.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

And they will learn nothing from this and release 16 more super hero movies, remakes nobody asked for, and prequels/sequels to movies that came out 20 - 30 years ago. I'm more excited for the movie Iron Lung because it's being made by a YouTuber that actually gives a shit about what they are making vs rehashed bullshit that focuses more on "second screen" attention instead of making something worth our time.

[–] JakobFel@retrolemmy.com 0 points 1 week ago

I don't care for Hollywood in the least but this isn't a positive development. Influencer culture really needs to die. I'd much rather see people switch to markets like anime and K-drama, as both of those are largely still packed to the brim with good art.