this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
83 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6310 readers
608 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gronk@aussie.zone 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

At 4C of warming the feedback loops of Earth begin to accelerate at an unprecedented rate, the economy is irrelevant from this point onwards.

Just one of these feedback loops has more CO2 equivalent than over 60% of anthropogenic emissions since the industrial revolution.

At 4C of warming the human race is due for extinction unless through its self perceived exceptionalism it somehow manages to circumvent the laws of thermodynamics.

The alternative is we start building a better tomorrow TODAY.

[–] relianceschool@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Agreed. I'm getting tired of these pencil-pusher reports implying that "the economy" is going to keep chugging along at a reduced rate, as if we can just shuffle around our stock portfolios and weather the storm.

The "Planetary Solvency" report by IFoA is one of the first mainstream papers that's taking a sober look at the climate crisis. If we hit 2°C by 2050, they're seeing a significant likelihood of:

  • 2 billion deaths
  • High number of climate tipping points triggered, partial tipping cascade.
  • Breakdown of some critical ecosystem services and Earth systems.
  • Major extinction events in multiple geographies.
  • Ocean circulation severely impacted.
  • Severe socio-political fragmentation in many regions, low lying regions lost.
  • Heat and water stress drive involuntary mass migration of billions.
  • Catastrophic mortality events from disease, malnutrition, thirst and conflict.

I don't even want to think about 3°C and 4°C scenarios.

[–] Gronk@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh I can definitely get behind that, I have my gripes with how the current climate consensus is insidiously stacked to give policymakers leeway and mislead the public with this bullshit.

I'm reading through it now and this part on NGFS reports really captures the sentiment:

This is analogous to carrying out a risk assessment of the impact of the Titanic hitting an iceberg but excluding from our model the possibility that the ship could sink, the shortage of lifeboats, and death from drowning or hypothermia.

As much as I hate talking about 'duh economee' when it comes to climate change (a thing that threatens the existence of us and many other beings) this report nails it.

Also the critical observations are good talking points when dealing with deniers/idiots

[–] rimu@piefed.social 4 points 20 hours ago

My favorite climate consensus roll-eyes is how all the graphs always stop at 2100. As if the heating will just stop at that point and we won't be looking at 6 degrees of warming by 2150. And 8 by 2200.

CO2 stays in the atmosphere for at least 500 years. There's no getting off this train.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

The one dependable thing has always been that all models end up underestimating results. "Worse/faster than expected" was never funny, but now it's so cliche that I don't even see it mentioned much anymore.

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

There goes my avacado toast stocks

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago

We are going to be 40% poorer regardless.