this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
837 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

72729 readers
1796 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 172 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's a shame how obvious they're working their corporate bullying cards simply because of money. Imagine if I created a product called Google and tried to sue Google for it. That would be ridiculous, right? Well, that's what Facebook is doing, just with money.

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago (5 children)

It's not what Facebook is doing. The company has owned the trademark for over a decade, and Facebook is trying to strong arm them into giving it up.

This is also in the UK where they somewhat stand up to companies like Facebook. McDonald's lost their trademark for the Big Mac for trying to do this exact same thing.

[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Maybe I didn't convey what I'm saying well. Facebook is attempting to take a name because they have money. Laws don't really apply to them, they seem to think, and it's because of their bullying and their money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jivebunny@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Also, Wendy's had this issue as well in Europe, but their issue was about their actual company name.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 4 points 2 years ago

Someone should start an alternate DNS root and then auction off facebook.com within their platform.

[–] Candybar121@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

hahaha i didnt know this happened. Supermac FTW!

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Eh, the UK isn't in the best situation, in terms of big tech. If anything, most FAANG companies have got away without paying any tax here for over a decade because the alternative is they ship all of their jobs elsewhere, and the UK tech scene implodes.

I think a UK court would likely stand up for the British company, as they should, but I would expect Meta to be allowed to throw their weight around a little.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Facebook isn’t suing Threads. The longtime trademark holder is suing Facebook.

[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] squiblet@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Okay, pointing out the analogy of "Imagine if I created a product called Google and tried to sue Google for it [...] Well, that’s what Facebook is doing" doesn't match this situation.

[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Facebook created a product called Threads and is attempting to bully Threads Software into taking their name. I was creating a hypothetical situation about how most small companies can't just steal a company trademark, because it's rightfully someone else's. However, if you are a larger company and, have enough money, and have shit ethics, then you can just kinda... ignore that, and for some reason, the US is happy to let wallets write the law.

They did this with Meta, too.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree, that is what they're doing. My only point was they're being sued, not suing someone. They just took the name and were ignoring the other company that was already using it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pastel_de_airfryer@lemmy.eco.br 72 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Didn't they pull the same shit back when they changed the company name to Meta?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 69 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Fuck I wish my old elementary school friends and parents wouldn't use Messenger. I'm eternslly stuck on that platform.

[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

i saw one person do something like this: messages JOIN ME ON SIGNAL(or anything not owned by Facebook and amazon) IF YOU DON'T WANT TO WELL WILL LOSE CONTACT SO PLEASE JOIN ME

im not sure on how well this will work but maybe exclude you're family but try to get them to atleast WhatsApp but even better a private messager also consider xmpp/jabber and matrix for jabber i recommend calyx institute jabber server

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

try to get them to atleast WhatsApp

WhatsApp is also owned by Facebook, so switching to that from Messenger is a bit like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Telegram or Signal. Whatsapp is owned by Meta

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

WhatsApp is facebook, it's not an improvement in the slightest

[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You can trial out a new platform called beeper.com

It allows you to add all your chats to 1 platform. It's in selected participants mode currently.

[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ahh thank you for the Beeper reminder! I'm still on the waitlist tho. :(

[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yh same :-(

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 57 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I predict that years will go by and it'll still be called Threads.

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just like Meta is a stolen name. Facebook doesn’t care.

[–] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

That's why the UK company is using a cease-and-desist approach, which apparently is an option in the UK.

[–] LemmyZed@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Absolutely zero care. Too much money gushing in.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd just sue em for a bunch of money and then license the name to them for a bunch more, and the website for a bunch more...

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

enjoy being tied up in court until you run out of money and they win by default

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can I sue for my legal fees or negotaite a percentage of winnings with my lawyer?

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Only if the lawyer is convinced they can win it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, since Meta/Facebook will probably be pulling out of the UK along with every other social media company, that’s hardly a “threat”

[–] DannyMac@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You mean, "That's hardly a 'thread?'"

I'll see myself out

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You mean, “hold this thread as I walk away” 🎶

[–] Amastan@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Threadful this story. Poor wee nerds. Fight them Meta’s

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Do you want to destroy my sweater?!?

[–] FrostbyteIX@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Ba-dum-tssss!

[–] zerkrazus@kbin.social 34 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if FB/Meta tried to just settle out of court and pay them off.

[–] mPony@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago

"That'll be one billion quid, please."

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

The company has said that they've spent a decade building their "brand" under that name. So, if they're pushing for a big payout, they intend it to be gargantuan rather than the usual payoff. Changing their name would essentially be starting over in some ways. And the confusion they claim as their reason for action is a legit thing.

I'm not saying that isn't their goal behind the scenes, but FB tried to buy the name and failed, so I have a feeling they aren't looking for the usual quiet payoff that's the goal of that type of action.

[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Threads isn't even a good name lol

[–] woshang@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Never download the Meta Threads.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Delete all meta accounts

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago

Take the L, Facebook!

[–] rynzcycle@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

ITT:...
...wait why did I just get kicked off facebook.

load more comments
view more: next ›