this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
281 points (99.0% liked)

politics

23037 readers
4004 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Law firms that complied with former Trump’s demands are now facing consequences, including lost clients and potential damage to their reputations.

Trump is reportedly delighted by the situation, viewing it as a victory.

The firms, who believed they could appease Trump, are now in turmoil as he continues to demand more from them.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 81 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trump will backstab absolutely anyone. He is notorious for not paying his bills, yet contractors keep signing up to work with him.

I just do not understand how anyone is still dumb enough to trust this piece of shit, let alone an entire law firm.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Because even if they don't get paid they can still say 'I worked for Donald Trump, this is why you should hire me' to any MAGAt in the country and get a job.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 83 points 3 days ago

The firms, who believed they could appease Trump, are now in turmoil as he continues to demand more from them.

If anyone was under the illusion that America was a meritocracy...

People running these huge law firms not being smart enough to recognize the pattern before it personally affected them is a pretty big sign it hasn't been for a long time.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I’m a bit floored that they didn’t all collectively get on a big conference call and say “you know what? Fuck this. This is our entire industry that he’s fucking with. Let’s go to work, chaps”. Like, holy shit, the precedent and its implications couldn’t be clearer, and they were too limpdick to do anything.

Yes, but they're just lawyers. If only they had applicable skills here that could help them challenge this in court.

They're lawyers. They'd have the call and immediately start screwing each other over. No group is simultaneously so machiavellian and so bad at it (Statesian Republicans maybe, seeing how easily they were coopted by Krasnov)

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago

trump is a bully. Bullies can’t be trusted to stop bullying by giving them what they want. Once they know they can get something from you by bullying, all they’ll do is keep bullying.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 23 points 3 days ago

Hmm, who could have predicted that collaboration with the most prolific traitor in American history would have negative repercussions?

[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 26 points 3 days ago

Any law firm that sides with a man that believes he is above the law shouldn't be in business.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 26 points 3 days ago

Go fash, lose cash. Knowing his administration was acting illegally to target your firm and choosing to back down and offer him free legal services is such a cowardly, short-sighted decision. Bullies only back down when you stand up to them.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can't see how anybody could retain these firms any more without putting themselves in legal jeopardy/turmoil.

Think about it. Lets say you've been working with one of these firms on an environmental issue for years. Suddenly, Trump declares that that issue is against his official policies and that they must now act on behalf of the Trump administration instead, or risk another EO revoking their security clearances. Which means now they have to drop you as a client due to the conflict of interest, because they couldn't drop Trump even if they wanted to.

And I don't give half a shit about the laws surrounding attorney/client privilege, because neither does Trump. Would you be 100% confident in a law firm that has at that point repeatedly bent the knee to Trump out of fear of retaliation not just turning over all your privileged files (either willingly, by coercion, or force) so Trump can use them against you? Or that Trump wouldn't just seize them via some NSA letter or something?

Even if one of these firms were willing to file a suit against the US government, would you feel 100% confident that your lawyers are giving you the zealous representation that they're required to give you against an enemy that literally has a Sword of Damocles hanging over their heads?

Every law firm that bends the knee deserves to go out of business.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

More than just going out of business, the bar should sanction them, including revoking law licenses. They have succumbed to extortion from a an organized crime organization, agreeing to compromise their legal obligations in order to appease a treasonous criminal. If they had done the same thing for someone like John Gotti or Whitey Bulger, there would be no question of punishment, and HitlerPig is worse than them, by a long ways.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Appeasement doesn't work with fascists and mafia dons -- two things that quintessentialize trump.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

"People continue to play Trump's games by Trump's rules, wonder why nothing ever changes. Film at 11."

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

i'm out of the loop.

what are law firms and why do they matter?

and what does trump have to do with them?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

He targetted law firms that have previously taken part in legal challenges against his administration or he himself with the Attorney General investigating them with no cause. Essentially threatening them with, pun completely intended, Trumped Up Charges and legal troubles so as to cripple or destroy their firms. They have made a bunch of concessions to Trump to avoid this. Everything from ending inclusion policies to offering millions in free legal services to his administration and affiliates. Now they are losing clients because of these concessions. Damned if they did, damned if they didn't. Trump is happy for them to die either way.

TL;DR: The Orange hypocrite is using the government as a weapon against the people he thinks have wronged him and is getting away with it.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

so wild to me that people who know the law inside out can't out think a guy who literally can't think

Trump's not doing anything himself. He's siccing his hounds on them. He has the entire staff of the executive branch to throw at them without the constraints of ethics or even the bounds of the law much of the time. Trump is dumb AF, but he has plenty of slimy sycophantic henchmen and women who are conniving and intelligent enough to pose a threat. And even if they, themselves, aren't smart enough, they have heritage foundation back legal counsels that spend their careers twisting and exploiting holes in the law for self-serving goals. I can't say that I would be in a hurry to put my company's resources against that machine either.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean the "damned if they dont" is cause everyone is just bending over for him, if everyone fought him he wouldn't have the resources to fight back.

[–] scintilla@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

But not everyone has bent the knee to him. I know at least one lawfirm is taking him to court if not out of morality they are at least smart enough to know that it looks good to go against the executive when it brakes the law.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

(this is not in support of Trump, just in case)

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

If I was a law firm that was extorted into working for Trump for free. I'd be sabotaging at every chance I could.

If you are in such a position. Please run the game on this clown.

What's he gonna do ? Fire you?

Sabotage.

As well they should and they're being blackmailed by Trump to do even more in their deal with a fat devil.