this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Memes

51520 readers
1035 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FrostBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I don’t think many Christians would actually argue for that first point tbh. It’s not something Biblically portrayed as one of God’s gifts. Free will is portrayed as something that was given conditionally, but taking from the tree of knowledge and specifically eating the fruit of knowledge is known as man’s first sin in the Bible.

I think it’s a bit of a metaphor for a parent wanting to shield their child from the harshness of reality, but as the sheltered child grows older they often want to know more about the outside world and in doing so become exposed to the cruelty. This was my own experience with religion growing up. A teacher of mine one day sat us down and pleaded the above with our class, as many of us grew to see through the veil of how reality looked.

In retrospect I think some things about the world make sense to not be told about, depending on one’s age. However, I think other things should never be hidden, have been hidden, or done in other cases.

Side note: I think the idea of God’s plan is for people to hold love for one another. Lots of people lose sight of what they are called to do and how they are to act though. They’re called to love their neighbor as their self, called to love their enemy, and called to forgive others for their transgressions. I personally think people are called to do good works in conjunction with holding faith, as people are called to act righteously in this life.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago

Don't worry, they don't read the Bible, and especially don't read the old testament.

They believe they have god given freedom of action

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don’t think many Christians would actually argue for that first point tbh.

Then truthfully, I don't think you've had this conversation with many christians. Every single one immediately defaults to that point when confronted with the horrors god would be responsible for if god is in control.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

the horrors god would be responsible for if god is in control

You're forgetting the counterfactual. Namely, that we live in The Best Of All Possible Worlds and what you describe as horror is actually the nicest things can conceivably get. The standard Christian argument is that, without God, existence would be significantly worse. Also (depending on your flavor of Christianity) the mortal life is a proving ground not a final destination. Life is a trial one experiences before being eligible to enter the Kingdom Of Heaven, where God is fully in control.

The horrors are a consequence of Free Will mixed with the corruptive influences of evil spirits sent out to tempt mortals to sin. And they are transient, while the Christian Reward is supposed to be eternal. You see this best in the Story of Job, during which he suffers a litany of torments but holds firm to his faith. This faith is ultimately rewarded, not just through the restoration of his material pleasures, but through the promise of an eternal blissful afterlife.

[–] FrostBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I’m not saying that people don’t have free will or that it’s not talked about in the Bible, but free will is not something presented as a gift, yet alone God’s greatest gift to humanity as the meme says.

From my perspective, once God set the universe in motion he has mostly taken a step back from direct action. I would say life is a test of sorts for us, to see if we can make earth resemble the good of heaven, on a humanity wide scale. But it’s also an individual test for each person’s willingness to use their obtained knowledge to still be good unto others. We are all the children of God, from my own perspective we are learning to become like God, who is the Bible is shown as loving and kind.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, since this is a religious discussion, I'm a Christian. It's always God.

Job 1:6-12 very clearly shows God granting permission for Satan to test Job.

1 Kings 22:19-22 shows the "court in heaven" and God soliciting ideas from spirits for enticing Ahab to attack Ramoth Gilead, where he will die. When a good suggestion is made, God grants permission.

Exodus 10:1-2 states clearly that God hardened Pharaoh's heart to not let the slaves go, so that God could display his "signs" (plagues).

Satan is a liar, and the father of lies.

Romans 9:19-21 NIV

One of you will say to me: “Then why does God still blame us? For who is able to resist his will?” But who are you, a human being, to talk back to God? “Shall what is formed say to the one who formed it, ‘Why did you make me like this?’ ” Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wow, sounds like a cruel deity that's definitely not worthy of worship.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Hey, at least you're judging based on the facts of what the Bible says. God is who He is. He's not campaigning. You disagree with Him, but at least it's really Him.

Of course, that puts you in the same position as Job. You want to judge God. You want to put him on trial. You disagree with Him.

And if you have the opportunity to question Him directly, you'll say the same thing Job said.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I'm judging a fictional character based on how he's characterized by the book he appears in. There may be a higher power, but the god of the Bible certainly ain't it.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Certainly? You have a better candidate? Baal? Molech? Satan, perhaps?

You do you; pick a side, deny the battle, anything you choose.

I'm quite seriously suggesting that the God of the Bible, and specifically the Christian God, is is the most perfect God that could be imagined, and yet wholly unexpected as He is revealed. The God of the Bible soothes no one. He ruffles everyone's feathers. He is pure perfect and exacting. Yet there is love and mercy there.

Now, His followers have done a lot to screw up that presentation. But that's as it always has been. In the Old Testament, in Jesus's day, and now, the people of God - even those with direct divine revelation - have been misrepresenting Him.

Joshua 24:15 NIV

But if serving the Lord seems undesirable to you, then choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your ancestors served beyond the Euphrates, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you are living. [Or the gods of reason, science, and unbelief?] But as for me and my household, we will serve the Lord.”

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Certainly. Any candidate that doesn't have a traceable origin as being created by people would be a good start, which all the religions of the world do.

I’m quite seriously suggesting that the God of the Bible, and specifically the Christian God, is is the most perfect God that could be imagined

Yes, that's what people of every religion say about their god. I'm guessing your parents are Christian?

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

"Traceable origin...as being created by people." You've set quite a high bar for yourself, but I assume you would consider your traceability as.....

Yes, nominally Christian. Raised in USA, fed cornbread and gospel music, prayin' at baseball games.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Here's an example of traceability. If the god of the bible were real, eternal, unchanging, etc., there would be no historical record of him being just another god in a pantheon until someone decided to make him THE god. This is just one example of many and you can do this with any god in any religion - there's nothing notably special about Yahwah aside from how popular his worship became.

I asked because it's especially suspicious if you have been raised from birth to believe in a god, even if it wasn't a main focus. My intention isn't to dissuade you from believing - I couldn't do that even if I wanted to - but just to encourage you to see Christianity objectively, looking at its history and how it compares with other religions. If you choose to have faith regardless, that's fine, and in fact is stronger than if you never questioned it at all. I just always prefer that people make an informed decision on things.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Certainly? You have a better candidate? Baal? Molech? Satan, perhaps?

A rose by any other name...

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Maeve like in The Boys? I'm unfamiliar with the name from anywhere else.

[–] FrostBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I would add that not every author is writing unbiased in the Bible. We know now for instance that some books near the end of the Bible attributed to Paul may not have been written by him, but by some of the people under Paul in the early church. So adding parts about women not holding positions of authority within the Church more or less served to cement their own positions and authority for the early-Christians that were formalizing the religion.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yep. That's addressed in books the Council left out.

[–] FrostBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

From my perspective, the Bible should have continued to been written forward, and included pieces of the issues Christians sought to address in their current times. I think an updated one would have spoken of the poorly of the actions taken by the church and followers alike through the ages, and would have followed people trying to do good in hard times.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

And if you have the opportunity to question Him directly, you’ll say the same thing Job said.

That would be what, "Why are you so weirdly obsessed with Leviathan?" after Job 41?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago

What’s the use of being god if every run-down schmuck with a two dollar prayer book can come along and fuck up your plan?

- George Carlin

https://youtu.be/PlzbFxYy08c

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

"I'm driven with a mission from God. God would tell me, 'George, go and fight those terrorists in Afghanistan.' And I did, and then God would tell me, 'George go and end the tyranny in Iraq,' and I did."

  • George W Bush

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/bush-god-told-me-to-invade-iraq-6262644.html

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jhogenbaum@leminal.space 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Did Calvin write this post?

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

Only the right half. Arminius was responsible for the left.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What shits me is Christians (and Jews and Muslims, but it's mainly Christians who do this) who just handwave away the problem of evil. Like fine, I can accept that some evils might arise as a result of human decisions and free will. Things like wars and genocides are done by people. It's difficult to swallow even that much with the idea of a god who supposedly knows all, is capable of doing anything, and is "all good", but fine, maybe free will ultimately supplants all that.

But what I absolutely cannot accept is any claim that tries to square the idea of a god with the triple-omnis with the fact that natural disasters happen. That children die of cancer. You try telling the parents of a child slowly dying of a painful incurable disease that someone could fix it if they wanted, and they completely know about it, but that they won't. And then try telling them that person is "all good". See how they react.

I find religious people who believe in the three omnis after having given it any amount of serious consideration to be absolutely disgusting and immoral people.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (18 children)

Any "evil" suffered in current life will be compensated with reward in afterlife.

The concept tends to fall apart with modern Christianity where everyone just goes to heaven and hell is written out.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

The concept tends to fall apart with modern Christianity where everyone just goes to heaven and hell is written out.

Huh? From what I can tell Christians are more fixated on hell than ever now. Listen to them talk about gay/trans people, Palestinians, women who get abortions, or literally anyone who isn't Christian, and it's clear that they're really excited about the idea that their god will torture those people for all eternity while they get to watch from heaven. You'll even get catholics and protestants both thinking they're the only ones going to heaven and the "wrong" kind of Christian goes to hell because of technicalities like whether you go to confession or not or whether praying to Mary is idolatry. Some outright say that it's okay to kill gay/trans people, Palestinians, etc, because they're damned anyway and god doesn't give a shit about them.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] underwire212@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago

I’m not necessarily disagreeing with you here, but thought I’d provide a counter argument.

A group of children are dying of a horrible, deadly disease that can only be cured with the bark from a specific tree. So we go into the forest and chop this tree down to save the children from an excruciating disease.

A squirrel had built its entire home in that tree. That tree was everything to the squirrel. Now the squirrel has nothing and will suffer because we chopped down its home.

How do we explain this to the squirrel? Well, we can’t. No matter how hard we try, we can’t explain why we needed to destroy its home. The squirrel is physically incapable of understanding.

Playing devils advocate here, perhaps the reason for the need for human suffering is so beyond our understanding and comprehension that we are just physically incapable of understanding. Maybe we’re just squirrels, and human suffering needs to happen for some greater purpose unbeknownst to us.

[–] popcap200@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (29 children)

I think you can have this same dilemma as an atheist as well. I'm personally agnostic as I don't have the knowledge to make a decision.

If we are all just atoms moving/reacting, surely everything we'd ever do would be predetermined by the initial reactions/vectors/forces at the big bang. I know there's quantum randomness and stuff, but it's possible that's all calculable and we simply don't have the means to calculate it. If that's the case, IMO we still have freewill because we can't predict the future, and it's still worthwhile to move forward doing our best to be good people.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago

I don't think believing in fate (or a plan) is strongly correlated with atheism

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

My take is that there is no free will, but that this fact is irrelevant and we're all better off just behaving as though we do.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›