this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
47 points (98.0% liked)

Games

18659 readers
718 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sineljora@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 hours ago

Remember, they gutted the whole dev team shortly after launch. It’s a zombie now.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 21 points 12 hours ago

I mean, that's all skins have been anyway. Originally you'd just upload a texture and do whatever you wanted. Then you could do the same with the models.
Then someone got the genius idea to make you pay for the privilege...

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

Nothing inside a video game should cost real money. Least of all how you look.

Only legislation will stop this. If we allow this to continue, there will be nothing else.

Ban the entire business model.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Blizzard tried this with the Dark Pathways Bundle for Diablo 4 before, 30$ to change the colors of the Town portals. Was not very successful!

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 21 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Infamously Dead or Alive did that with character hair colours. That is, not paying to unlock the option, not even paying to unlock individual colours to swap them when you want : you'd have to pay every time you wanted to change a character's hair.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 13 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I love fighting games.

But holy fuck is the monetization some of the most outrageous I've seen.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

Every once in a while I’ll look up the price for the full version of DOA with all the skins and suddenly I don’t feel bad about my gaming budget.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Genre wide? I wouldn't say so.

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Enshittification. I am so jaded with all this.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The most depressing aspect of it is how many people keep falling for this kind of crap.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I blame streamers for that. Rivals sponsored a lot of streamers, which is kind of interesting for a free to play game. But if you watch theirs streams, the first thing they always do is looking at the new skins IMMEDIATELY. and then they tell you how absolutely fire the new skins are and they buy some with the score credit they get.

They just normalise buying a 20 dollar skin.

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Don't know about Rivals, but in Fortnite they also tell you to use their creator code, which gives them some commission any time someone buys something. Affiliate marketing, basically. So, it makes sense for them to go to shop and show all the shiny new skins and how great they are.