this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
559 points (98.6% liked)

News

29028 readers
3785 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump spent his first 100 days back in the Oval Office driving an economy that the world envied to the brink of crisis, risking America’s reputation as a financial safe haven and fostering fear among voters who’ve lost confidence in his leadership.

Americans were desperate for relief from high grocery prices and bought into Trump’s promise to make America affordable again in November 2024, partly out of nostalgia for the pre-pandemic economy of his first term.

But the president deliberately and singlehandedly adopted policies that are almost certain to spike prices even more; that could lead to shortages; and that have CEOs and small businesses dealing with chaos and the possibility of a recession.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 17 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

So here's the fucking thing.

The crisis is already here. Go take a peak at the ports on the west coast right now. Go look at business forecasts.

This man systematically destroyed a working economy in a business quarter.

The repercussions of these actions are going to be felt for at least a decade.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They will be felt for the rest of the century.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 4 points 49 minutes ago

Totally agreed.

These people literally are destroying the pre eminent power and completely usurping centuries old historical power hierarchies seemingly for the benefit of shorting the markets on their own whim.

As if those dollars they earn will be worth anything when hyperinflation hits.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 14 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

brink of a crisis

Ummm I don't think the meaning of a crisis is understood anymore. Brink implies risking a crisis, where the usa has been in a full on crisis on many fronts for about 100 days. I would even say that they are past the initial crisis point and are getting way to cocky this far into a multi pronged collapse.

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 hours ago

Hyuck hyuck hyuck

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Trump’s promise? I don’t remember him promising much anything at all until the very tail end of the campaign, and even then it was kinda offhand. OTOH, the troll farms were in absolute overdrive talking about eggs, groceries, worthless higher education, gas prices (even though they are higher now) and of course bashing Harris over tons of things that weren’t even jobs she had the authority to do.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Trump did state he was going to raise tarrifs. The problem is that a lot of voters thought he was going to govern like he did in the first term.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What was so great about the first term? The only thing that kept that from being a disaster was the fact that people stopped him from doing so many shitty things. Now he’s ignoring everyone including the courts.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 48 minutes ago

Trump was relatively ineffective on his first term because he didn't know how to be effective and didn't choose to ignore the courts.

Trying to put myself in the shoes of a Trump supporter who isn't an idiot, they probably thought the damage Trump could do for a second term would be as limited as it was for the first term while still keeping a governmental status quo.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

And some people still say he has business skills...

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

What, you don't think he's getting rich off this?

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 32 minutes ago

Yeah people misunderstand Trump's business history. It doesn't matter how many casinos he bankrupted, Trump profited. He's a vampire like a private equity firm, leaving a trail of dead husks behind him.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

MAGAts know nothing but hurting others.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

They also know hurting themselves.

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 8 points 4 hours ago

Not even. Him and Elon biffed every other form of autocratic guidance that laid out steps to take.

Cutis Yarvin is furious at how incompetent Musk and Torange have been. By 100 days in they should have been drowning journalists in foam. They haven't even hit 50% of Project 2025 progress.

Rank amateur bitches. Can't even do authoritarianism well.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 195 points 9 hours ago (23 children)

Sure, but have you considered that Kamala had a weird laugh

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 40 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This is such a stupid argument and I wouldn’t believe it if it wasn’t for my dad. He keeps talking about her laugh and I explain to him that it’s appropriate to express all emotions…. And he doesn’t believe it. He’s also unable to connect me being in therapy and his behavior.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

The statistics of who stayed home VS who voted for a white man with the same policies (older white men/women and older hispanic men) shows most of the votes lost are from Kamala being a colored woman and our most bigoted groups responding accordingly.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Schodinger's cat applies here. We will never know how good or bad Kamala would have been since she didn't win. However, since 47 has done so much shit to damage the country in ways worse than imagined, I'd say she'd done better.

BTW, have you ever heard Trump laughing at anything? That's even weirder IMO.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 9 points 4 hours ago

She would have been better. Biden was an OK president that was ruined by his brazen pro-genocide stance. It doesn't take a lot to be better than Trump.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's a competition to destroy the US and your opponent is Donald Trump.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

That's about the only competitive scenario you could put me in vs. Trump and I'd despair that there would be no path to victory for me.

[–] gaja@lemm.ee 56 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Musk will light your taxes on fire. Obama was huge on deportation. Kamala is a gun owner. OK, why won't you vote for Kamala then? "I just don't like her. She laughs weird." I couldn't believe it, but it shouldn't shock me. How do you even keep going after that?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 47 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

It wasn't really about the laugh.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Yea, some of them also noticed she is a minority and a woman. Sadly our country has not accepted those groups are just as capable as white men to lead a country.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 43 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

The brink? lol we’ve gone off the cliff and are in free-fall

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago

You ever see those cartoons where a samurai charges past someone, nothing happens, the person laughs, and then slowly splits in half?

The US economy is currently in the "nothing happens / laughing" phase.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›